Author
Listed:
- M. Marciňáková
(Institute of Animal Physiology of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic)
- V. Strompfová
(Institute of Animal Physiology of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic)
- K. Boldižárová
(Institute of Animal Physiology of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic)
- M. Simonová
(Institute of Animal Physiology of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic)
- A. Lauková
(Institute of Animal Physiology of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic)
- P. Naď
(University of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Experimental Veterinary Medicine, Košice, Slovak Republic)
Abstract
A group of twenty-six turkeys at the age of seven weeks was divided into four groups (7 birds in three groups 5 in control). The first group of turkeys was used as the control group. The other three groups were inoculated for 7 days with the following bacteria: Enterococcus faecium EE3 strain (2.1 × 109 cfu/ml), E. faecium EK13 strain (1.76 × 1010 cfu/ml) and E. faecium EF55 strain (5 × 108 cfu/ml). Sampling of faeces from each turkey was done at the beginning of experiment (at day 0) and in 7 days from the strain application. The total counts of EE3 strain in faeces of turkeys in EE3 group at day 7 were 4.07 ± 1.04 log cfu/g. At the same day bacteriocin-producing strain EK13 reached the value 5.26 ± 0.2 log cfu/g and the counts of EF55 strain amounted to 4.13 ± 0.64 log cfu/g. When total counts of E. coli colonies were checked at day 7 after the application of EE3 and EF55 strains to turkeys, significant differences in cell counts were found out (in EE3 group a difference of 2.43 log, P < 0.01; in EF55 group a difference of 1.93 log, P < 0.001) compared to the control and EE3 and EF55 groups. The highest reduction of Pseudomonas spp. was determined at day 7 after EE3 strain application (difference of 1.85; P < 0.01) and after EF55 strain application (difference of 0.78 log, P < 0.05) in comparison with the control group. EK13 strain did not influence the counts of E. coli and Pseudomonas spp. in faeces of turkeys. The average daily gain increased in all probiotic groups compared to the control group (EE3 group - 12.2%, EK13 group - 12.9%, EF55 group - 11.8%). At the beginning of experiment the values of total proteins were below the physiological limit in all groups. Although the intake of probiotic strains was associated with an increase in total proteins, the values were not adjusted to the physiological level. The values of total lipids were above the physiological level at the beginning of experiment. Administration of only EE3 strain significantly decreased the level of total lipids (difference of 1.22; log P < 0.01). The values of haematocrit, haemoglobin and activity of the blood enzyme glutathione peroxidase were not influenced.
Suggested Citation
M. Marciňáková & V. Strompfová & K. Boldižárová & M. Simonová & A. Lauková & P. Naď, 2005.
"Effect of potential probiotic Enterococcus faecium strains on selected microflora in turkeys,"
Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(8), pages 341-346.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:50:y:2005:i:8:id:4175-cjas
DOI: 10.17221/4175-CJAS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:50:y:2005:i:8:id:4175-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.