IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjg/v52y2016i1id122-2015-cjgpb.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of faba bean (Vicia faba) varieties on the development of Bruchus rufimanus

Author

Listed:
  • Marek SEIDENGLANZ

    (Department of Plant Protection, AGRITEC Research, Breeding and Services, Ltd., Šumperk, Czech Republic)

  • Igor HUŇADY

    (Department of Grain Legumes and Technical Crops, Agritec Plant Research Ltd., Šumperk, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The development of Bruchus rufimanus was assessed in randomised field trials from 2005 to 2007 with eight faba bean genotypes (SU 5/13, SU-BT, Mistral, Merkur, Stabil Merlin, Melodie, Divine). Significant differences, reproducible between the years, were found between the faba bean lines. The varieties most attractive to B. rufimanus ovipositing females were SU-BT and Divine. Merkur showed a certain level of non-preference. The highest mortality rates of eggs and first instar larvae in pod valve tissues were recorded in Merkur (34-45%) and Divine (51-55%). The highest mortality rates of larvae and pupae during their development in seeds (effect of seed coat and cotyledon tissues) were recorded in Merkur (87-90%) and Melodie (87-99%). Parasitation by Triaspis thoracicus contributed to this mortality. The highest levels of B. rufimanus parasitation were found in SU-BT (32-35%), the lowest in Melodie (3-9%). The total reduction in Bruchus rufimanus individuals during their development was relatively high in all varieties, ranging from 72% to 99%.

Suggested Citation

  • Marek SEIDENGLANZ & Igor HUŇADY, 2016. "Effects of faba bean (Vicia faba) varieties on the development of Bruchus rufimanus," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(1), pages 22-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:52:y:2016:i:1:id:122-2015-cjgpb
    DOI: 10.17221/122/2015-CJGPB
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/122/2015-CJGPB.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/122/2015-CJGPB.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/122/2015-CJGPB?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marek Seidenglanz & Jiří Rotrekl & Jana Poslušná & Pavel Kolařík, 2011. "Ovicidal effects of thiacloprid, acetamiprid, lambda-cyhalothrin and alpha-cypermethrin on Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) eggs," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 47(3), pages 109-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Umair Ali & Muhammad Ashfaq & Abdul Rafeeh Shakeel & Asad Ali, 2022. "Improved Quality Of Faba Beans (Vicia Faba L.) Crop With Bio-Control Against Bruchid Beetle (Bruchus Rufimanus)," Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture (MJSA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 01-05, November.
    2. Adrien Rodrigue Lugendo & Ibtissem Ben Fekih & Rudy Caparros Megido & Jérôme Pierreux & Frédéric Francis & Arnaud Segers, 2025. "Efficacy of Entomopathogenic Fungi Against Bruchus rufimanus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Laboratory and Field Trials Using Dropleg Spraying Technique," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marek Seidenglanz & María Muñoz Arbeález & Jaroslav Šafář & Petr Heděnec & Eliška Ondráčková & Romana Bajerová, 2022. "Early flowering field pea variety (Pisum sativum L.) as a trap crop for pea weevils (Bruchus pisorum L.)," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(3), pages 245-257.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:52:y:2016:i:1:id:122-2015-cjgpb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.