IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjg/v51y2015i3id44-2015-cjgpb.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of selected winter wheat cultivars to inoculation with different Mycosphaerella graminicola isolates

Author

Listed:
  • Václav ŠÍP

    (Division of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Crop Research Institute, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic)

  • Jana CHRPOVÁ

    (Division of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Crop Research Institute, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic)

  • Jana PALICOVÁ

    (Division of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Crop Research Institute, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Five winter wheat cultivars, differing in resistance to Septoria tritici blotch (STB), were spray inoculated under field conditions for two years and at two locations with nine Mycosphaerella graminicola isolates and a mixture of isolates that were obtained from different regions of the Czech Republic. Main aims of this study were (i) to compare isolate, host cultivar and environmental effects on five traits indicative of STB severity and (ii) to analyse pathogen aggressiveness and host-pathogen relations for improving evaluation of cultivar resistance. ANOVA showed in all traits, except the reduction in 1000 grain weight, significant isolate effects. However, the effects of isolate and genotype by isolate interactions were much lower (2.3-4%) than cultivar (19.1-53.7%) and environmental (11.9-58.6%) effects. Cultivar resistance to the disease limited much the loss in grain weight per spike to a halve, from 34.7% in the susceptible Bakfis to 17.3% in the resistant Arina. Visual scoring of symptoms in the middle and at the end of disease development (performed on the 1-9 scale), reflecting the disease progress and infected leaf area, showed the highest cultivar effect (54%) and could be recommended for evaluation of cultivar resistance in breeding practice. All examined traits were significantly interrelated, but significant differences between all the five cultivars were only detected after examination of the % coverage of flag leaves with lesions bearing pycnidia. Resistance in the cultivar Arina was detected by all isolates and the isolate mixture. In spite of significant differences in classification of resistances in the cultivars Bohemia and Mulan after inoculation with one isolate (1081), specific interactions between cultivars and isolates collected in this Central European region are rare. The study leads to a conclusion that investigation into stability of STB resistance across a wide range of environments is more valuable for breeding purposes than the study of cultivar response to different isolates. Combination of important isolate properties in a mixture of isolates is stressed as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Václav ŠÍP & Jana CHRPOVÁ & Jana PALICOVÁ, 2015. "Response of selected winter wheat cultivars to inoculation with different Mycosphaerella graminicola isolates," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(3), pages 86-95.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:51:y:2015:i:3:id:44-2015-cjgpb
    DOI: 10.17221/44/2015-CJGPB
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/44/2015-CJGPB.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/44/2015-CJGPB.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/44/2015-CJGPB?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:51:y:2015:i:3:id:44-2015-cjgpb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.