IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjg/v45y2009i1id30-2008-cjgpb.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yield stability and resistance to leaf spot diseases and rosette in groundnut

Author

Listed:
  • Godfrey Akpan IWO

    (Department of Crop Science, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria)

  • P.E. OLORUNJU

    (Department of Crop Science, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria)

Abstract

Twenty-three advanced groundnut lines were evaluated for yield and resistance to early leaf spot (Mycosphaerella arachidis Deighton), late leaf spot (Mycosphaerella berkeleyi W.A. Jenkins) and rosette virus in on-station trials in 2001 and 2002. All the early groundnut lines were relatively resistant to rosette virus, early leaf spot and late leaf spot except ICGV-SM-93523 and ICGV-SM-93525, which were susceptible to late leaf spot. The medium maturing lines showed mostly higher levels of diseases, except MS16-791, which performed very well against all three diseases. The late groundnut lines were mostly susceptible to one or more of the diseases, except 49-85A and ICGV-SM-93532. Nine groundnut lines, combining high yield and resistance against all three diseases, were selected for on-farm trials at four locations in 2004 and 2005. In the on-farm trials all the nine selected lines were also resistant or highly resistant to rosette and both early and late leaf spot, while the local check, Makodi, was susceptible to all three diseases in both the on-station and on-farm trials. The analysis of yield data obtained at the eight environments, based on the linear statistical model yij = μ + ai+ ej + rij, estimated the genetic variance about three times higher than the residual variance. Still better results were obtained with the multiplicative model yij = μaibj+ ej + rij, where the genetic variance was more than four times higher than the residual variance and a still better differentiation of cultivars was thus possible. Significant differences in cultivar stability, expressed as the variation coefficient of the ai estimates (i.e. the variation of Standardised Relative Yields) from the multiplicative model across the eight environments, were observed. The check cultivar Makodi, though quite stable, was the lowest yielding of all tested ones. The groundnut line ICGV-1S-96805 combined very high yielding capacity and outstanding disease resistance with good, though not the highest, yield stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Godfrey Akpan IWO & P.E. OLORUNJU, 2009. "Yield stability and resistance to leaf spot diseases and rosette in groundnut," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 45(1), pages 18-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:45:y:2009:i:1:id:30-2008-cjgpb
    DOI: 10.17221/30/2008-CJGPB
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/30/2008-CJGPB.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/30/2008-CJGPB.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/30/2008-CJGPB?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Schwarzbach & Jiří Hartmann & Hans-Peter Piepho, 2007. "Multiplicative main cultivar effects in Czech official winter wheat trials 1976-2005," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 43(4), pages 117-124.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:45:y:2009:i:1:id:30-2008-cjgpb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.