Author
Listed:
- Sergej Ostojic
(Applied Bioenergetics Lab, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Department of Nutrition and Public Health, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary)
- Milan Vranes
(Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia)
Abstract
The main goal of this study was to evaluate the concentration and release dynamics of molecular hydrogen (H2, dihydrogen) in dietary evaluate supplements and identify products that provide a biologically significant amount of dihydrogen suitable for human consumption. We examined ten commercial supplements marketed for their dihydrogen content, including slow-release capsules and tablets (4 products), effervescent powders and tablets (5 products), and canned ready-to-drink beverage (1 product). These products were acquired either through online purchases, from retail stores, or obtained free of charge directly from the manufacturers upon request. Dihydrogen concentration was measured using a highly sensitive Clark-type hydrogen microsensor with a detection limit 0.05 µmol.L-1. Out of the ten products examined, only three (30.0%) exhibited dihydrogen levels surpassing the levels marketed as biologically relevant (500 µmol.L-1), and one of these products (a canned ready-to-drink beverage) approached this level with a concentration of 439.2 µmol.L-1. Interestingly, all slow-release capsules yielded negligible amounts of hydrogen (< 2 µmol.L-1), while a slow-release tablet delivered 43.6 µmol.L-1 of dihydrogen per single dose. The substantial variance in dihydrogen content among the assessed supplements holds significant implications for the general public, as high-potency products have the potential to provide up to 7 000 times more dihydrogen per single dosage compared to their low-potency counterparts.
Suggested Citation
Sergej Ostojic & Milan Vranes, 2024.
"Molecular hydrogen content of different dietary supplements,"
Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 42(2), pages 136-140.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:42:y:2024:i:2:id:16-2024-cjfs
DOI: 10.17221/16/2024-CJFS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:42:y:2024:i:2:id:16-2024-cjfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.