Author
Listed:
- Filip Beňo
- Jan Kostlán
(Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Jan Pivoňka
(Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Václav Pohůnek
(Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Rudolf Ševčík
(Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic)
Abstract
Water activity (aw) is a key factor influencing dry-cured meat products' safety. However, the standards for determining aw do not specify how the laboratory sample for self-analysis should be prepared and adjusted for determination in this type of food. This work aimed to verify whether the place of sampling and method of sample preparation of dry-cured meat products can influence the measured value of aw. For this purpose, samples of dry-cured heat-treated and fermented meat products were purchased from the local market. Samples before analysis were taken from the edges and centre of the meat products, and preparation consisted of: i) homogenisation; ii) dicing (4 × 4 × 4 mm); iii) slicing. The results of this work indicate that aw is significantly affected by both the part of the product from which the sample is taken and the method of preparation of the sample itself (P < 0.05). The highest measured values of aw were determined in samples prepared by slicing, and the lowest values were determined in homogenised samples. The place of sampling significantly affects the aw, especially for dry-cured heat-treated products.
Suggested Citation
Filip Beňo & Jan Kostlán & Jan Pivoňka & Václav Pohůnek & Rudolf Ševčík, 2023.
"Water activity of Czech dry-cured meat products: Influence of sampling point and sample preparation method,"
Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 41(5), pages 340-347.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:41:y:2023:i:5:id:99-2023-cjfs
DOI: 10.17221/99/2023-CJFS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:41:y:2023:i:5:id:99-2023-cjfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.