IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjf/v35y2017i5id276-2016-cjfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of sensory quality of calf chops with different fat cover using a specific sensory method by a trained panel

Author

Listed:
  • Iñaki Etaio

    (Laboratorio de Análisis Sensorial Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Centro de Investigación Lascaray Ikergunea, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
    Lactiker research team (Quality and safety of foods of animal origin), Department of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Pilar F. Gil

    (Laboratorio de Análisis Sensorial Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Centro de Investigación Lascaray Ikergunea, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Mónica Ojeda

    (Laboratorio de Análisis Sensorial Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Centro de Investigación Lascaray Ikergunea, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Luis Javier R. Barron

    (Lactiker research team (Quality and safety of foods of animal origin), Department of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Francisco José Pérez Elortondo

    (Laboratorio de Análisis Sensorial Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Centro de Investigación Lascaray Ikergunea, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
    Lactiker research team (Quality and safety of foods of animal origin), Department of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

Abstract

Carcass fat cover is used in many countries as a predictor of meat quality, although studies relating this parameter to sensor y quality of meat are scarce and are mainly based on acceptability or palatability evaluation. The samples of calf chops with three different degrees of carcass fat cover were analysed according to a specific method for sensor y quality assessment. A trained panel evaluated the samples and scored the sensor y quality related to odour, texture, flavour, and persistence. Samples with higher carcass fat cover presented significantly better scores for texture, flavour, and persistence, although not for odour. When calculating global sensor y quality by integrating the cited parameters, significant differences were found between the three fat cover groups. Texture, f lavour, and persistence were also correlated with fat cover and marbling degree. Specific sensor y characteristics (medium tenderness, slightly tough, rancid odour, cooked meat aroma, equal or higher than fat aroma, ver y low aroma intensity, dominance of fat aroma, obvious liver aroma and milky aroma) contributed to explaining the quality differences obser ved among the groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Iñaki Etaio & Pilar F. Gil & Mónica Ojeda & Luis Javier R. Barron & Francisco José Pérez Elortondo, 2017. "Assessment of sensory quality of calf chops with different fat cover using a specific sensory method by a trained panel," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 35(5), pages 392-400.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:35:y:2017:i:5:id:276-2016-cjfs
    DOI: 10.17221/276/2016-CJFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/276/2016-CJFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/276/2016-CJFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/276/2016-CJFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:35:y:2017:i:5:id:276-2016-cjfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.