Author
Listed:
- Ivan Švec
(Department of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Marie Hrušková
(Department of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Jan Karas
(Department of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Taťána Hofmanová
(Department of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
Abstract
The baking quality in the sets of both commercial and variety wheat samples (80 and 18 items) and wheat composite flour (standard and 25 blends) was evaluated in terms of the Solvent retention capacity method (AACC 56-11). Composites were prepared from a commercial fine wheat flour and commercial bio-wholemeal flour prepared by milling of common wheat, rye, oat, barleys and corn at substitution levels of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50%. The commercial wheat quality testing ANOVA revealed the major effect of the sample tested form; the data measured for grain and flour proved to be correlated. Besides, the harvest year affected the baking quality to a greater degree than the growing locality. Within the variety wheat set, the harvest year factor dominated over that of the wheat cultivar one with the exception of the sodium carbonate retention capacity. In the case of the wheat flour substitution by bio-cereal flour types, the added amount of the alternative flour supported only the quantitative change caused by the incorporated cereal in all four retention capacities.
Suggested Citation
Ivan Švec & Marie Hrušková & Jan Karas & Taťána Hofmanová, 2012.
"Solvent retention capacity for different wheats and flours evaluation,"
Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 30(5), pages 429-437.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:30:y:2012:i:5:id:386-2011-cjfs
DOI: 10.17221/386/2011-CJFS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:30:y:2012:i:5:id:386-2011-cjfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.