IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjf/v30y2012i4id86-2011-cjfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of detection sensitivity of five microbial inhibition tests for the screening of aminoglycoside residues in fortified milk

Author

Listed:
  • Zuzana Sýkorová Goffová

    (Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, Slovak Republic)

  • Ivona Kožárová

    (Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, Slovak Republic)

  • Dionýz Máté

    (Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, Slovak Republic)

  • Slavomír Marcinčák

    (Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, Slovak Republic)

  • Zuzana Gondová

    (Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, Slovak Republic)

  • Drahomíra Sopková

    (Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, Slovak Republic)

Abstract

The assessment of detection sensitivity of five microbial inhibition tests (MITs), STAR (screening test for antibiotic residues) with the test strain Bacillus subtilis BGA, Delvotest® S P-NT, Total Antibiotics, Kalidos TB, and Kalidos MP with the test strain Bacillus stearothermophilus var. calidolactis to five aminoglycosides (AMGs), gentamicin, neomycin, streptomycin, kanamycin, and spectinomycin in fortified milk samples were studied. The sensitivity of MITs to AMGs was evaluated on the basis of experimental determination of detection limits (LODs) of MITs for AMGs. The LODs of these tests were compared with the maximum residue limits (MRLs) established for milk by the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 37/2010. LODs of STAR for AMGs in fortified milk samples were at the levels of MRL for neomycin (1.50 µg/g), gentamicin (0.10 µg/g), streptomycin (0.20 µg/g) and kanamycin (0.15 µg/g). Spectinomycin (0.20 µg/g) was not detected at the level of MRL. The LODs determined by Delvotest® SP-NT, Total Antibiotics and Kalidos MP were comparable, but only gentamicin and neomycin were reliably detected at the levels of MRL. Kalidos TB was more sensitive to AMGs than Delvotest® SP-NT, Total Antibiotics and Kalidos MP. Gentamicin, neomycin and streptomycin were detected at the levels of MRL.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuzana Sýkorová Goffová & Ivona Kožárová & Dionýz Máté & Slavomír Marcinčák & Zuzana Gondová & Drahomíra Sopková, 2012. "Comparison of detection sensitivity of five microbial inhibition tests for the screening of aminoglycoside residues in fortified milk," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 30(4), pages 314-320.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:30:y:2012:i:4:id:86-2011-cjfs
    DOI: 10.17221/86/2011-CJFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/86/2011-CJFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/86/2011-CJFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/86/2011-CJFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:30:y:2012:i:4:id:86-2011-cjfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.