Author
Listed:
- Tomaž Požrl
(Department of Food Science and Technology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana Jamnikarjeva, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
- Mirela Kopjar
(Faculty of Food Technology, Franje Kuhača, Osijek, Croatia)
- Irena Kurent
(ŽITO Prehrambena industrija d.d., Ljubljana, Slovenia)
- Janez Hribar
(Department of Food Science and Technology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana Jamnikarjeva, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
- Anja Janeš
(Department of Food Science and Technology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana Jamnikarjeva, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
- Marjan Simčič
(Department of Food Science and Technology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana Jamnikarjeva, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
Abstract
Phytic acid has been considered to be an antinutrient due to its ability to bind minerals and proteins, either directly or indirectly, thus changing their solubility, functionality, absorption, and digestibility. In this study, the influence of the flour type (type 500, type 850, and whole meal flour) and three different breadmaking procedures (direct, indirect, and with sourdough addition) on phytic acid was investigated. The results showed that the flour type influenced the phytic acid content. The phytic acid contents of flour type 500, type 850, and whole meal flour was 0.4380, 0.5756, and 0.9460 g/100 g dm, respectively. The dough and bread prepared from flour with a higher phytic acid content also contained higher amount of phytic acid. During fermentation and baking, degradation of phytic acid occurred. Phytic acid was also influenced by pH. Samples of lower pH had a lower phytic acid content. Dough prepared from flour type 500 and type 850 with 10% addition of sourdough had especially low phytic acid contents, and the bread prepared from the respective dough contained no phytic acid at all.
Suggested Citation
Tomaž Požrl & Mirela Kopjar & Irena Kurent & Janez Hribar & Anja Janeš & Marjan Simčič, 2009.
"Phytate degradation during breadmaking: The influence of flour type and breadmaking procedures,"
Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 27(1), pages 29-38.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:27:y:2009:i:1:id:130-2008-cjfs
DOI: 10.17221/130/2008-CJFS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:27:y:2009:i:1:id:130-2008-cjfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.