IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brv/journl/v11y2013i1p69-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Geneva Talks And The European Union: Conditionality And Social Learning Or Strategic Socialization?

Author

Listed:
  • Levan Makhashvili

    (Tbilisi State University)

Abstract

The Geneva Talks – a negotiations’ framework founded after the EU brokered ‘Cease-Fire Agreement’ ending the dramatic August 2008 war between Georgia and Russia – has brought only marginal progress. It is thus striking why the European Union could not make the Geneva Talks a successful story. The paper discusses the EU instruments and mediation types to explain the failure. The analysis reveals that the EU mediation styles have been only partially effective. It also demonstrates that EU conditionality and social learning have failed to succeed because of a strong ‘patron’ state in the region – Russia. The examination further suggests that the separatists merely and strategically socialize themselves to get more benefits rather than to internally change their deep-rooted interests. The paper thus concludes that because of these shortcomings the EU has been incapable of pushing the negotiations to a successful end.

Suggested Citation

  • Levan Makhashvili, 2013. "The Geneva Talks And The European Union: Conditionality And Social Learning Or Strategic Socialization?," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 11(1), pages 69-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:brv:journl:v:11:y:2013:i:1:p:69-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fmv.euba.sk/RePEc/brv/journl/MV2013-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karol Sorby, 2017. "Zložitá cesta k egyptsko-izraelskej mierovej zmluve, 1979," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 15(1), pages 93-112.
    2. Milan Lajčiak, 2017. "East Asia: cultural fundamentals and market paradigms," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 15(1), pages 28-50.
    3. Pavel Neumann, 2017. "Změny V Mezinárodním Obchodu A Světové Výrobě Ve Světle Nových Trendů Globalizace," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 15(1), pages 75-92.
    4. Lenka Caisová, 2017. "Role Theoretic Approach And North Korean Foreign Policy Analysis," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 15(1), pages 5-27.
    5. Levan Makhashvili, 2017. "(In)Effectiveness Of The Eu Conflict Management And Mediation In Georgia And Moldova – View From Berlin," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 15(1), pages 51-74.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    mediation style; European Union; Russia; conditionality; social learning; strategic socialization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brv:journl:v:11:y:2013:i:1:p:69-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mykhaylo Kunychka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eubaask.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.