IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brc/brccej/v6y2021i4p67-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional Banking And Fintech Disruption. Projections, Dynamics, Competition And Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Marius GUST

    (Constantin Brancoveanu University of Pitesti, Romania)

Abstract

In recent years, financial innovation has accelerated greatly, new financial services have radically changed the banking environment. The main factors contributing to the dynamism of fintech are the development of IT and mobile communications infrastructure, pioneering financial services offered by new technology companies and the design of new financial services based on consumer needs. The fintech areas are: credit, deposits and capital raising services; payment, clearing and settlement services, including alternative currencies; financial investment and insurance services. However, in the near future many of the new financial services will not pose too much of a problem for banks. For example, P2P loans will reduce the market share of banks, but in no case will they eliminate bank loans because, on the one hand, the clientele that will go to the market for P2P loans will be the risky one, unapproved by banks. and on the other hand, because credit institutions still have the majority of resources and the majority of customers. Another example is payments, which continue to be carried out mainly by banks because alternative systems do not yet have a global infrastructure, and the completion of payments presupposes the existence of the legal tender issued only by central banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius GUST, 2021. "Traditional Banking And Fintech Disruption. Projections, Dynamics, Competition And Efficiency," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 6(4), pages 67-76.
    • Handle: RePEc:brc:brccej:v:6:y:2021:i:4:p:67-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revec.ro/papers/210409.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thakor, Anjan V., 2020. "Fintech and banking: What do we know?," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seiler, Volker & Fanenbruck, Katharina Maria, 2021. "Acceptance of digital investment solutions: The case of robo advisory in Germany," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Teck Ming Tan & Saila Saraniemi, 2023. "Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: Future directions in blockchain marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 914-939, July.
    3. Doumpos, Michalis & Zopounidis, Constantin & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Platanakis, Emmanouil & Zhang, Wenke, 2023. "Operational research and artificial intelligence methods in banking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 1-16.
    4. Baomin Chen & Xinyun Yang & Zhenzhong Ma, 2022. "Fintech and Financial Risks of Systemically Important Commercial Banks in China: An Inverted U-Shaped Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Isabelle Flückiger & Meryem Duygun, 2022. "New technologies and data in insurance," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(3), pages 495-498, July.
    6. Bianchi, Milo & Bouvard, Matthieu & Gomes, Renato & Rhodes, Andrew & Shreeti, Vatsala, 2023. "Mobile payments and interoperability: Insights from the academic literature," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Yinhong Yao & Jianping Li, 2022. "Operational risk assessment of third-party payment platforms: a case study of China," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Kowalewski, Oskar & Pisany, Paweł, 2022. "Banks' consumer lending reaction to fintech and bigtech credit emergence in the context of soft versus hard credit information processing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. Fred Huibers, 2021. "Regulatory Response to the Rise of Fintech Credit in The Netherlands," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, August.
    10. Anton Miglo, 2022. "Choice between IEO and ICO: Speed vs. Liquidity vs. Risk," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Chen, S. & Doerr, S. & Frost, J. & Gambacorta, L. & Shin, H.S., 2023. "The fintech gender gap," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    12. Krzysztof Waliszewski & Anna Warchlewska, 2021. "How we can benefit from personal finance management applications during the COVID-19 pandemic? The Polish case," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 681-699, March.
    13. Huang, Shuo, 2022. "Does FinTech improve the investment efficiency of enterprises? Evidence from China’s small and medium-sized enterprises," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 571-586.
    14. Luo, Qi & Hu, Haoyu & Feng, Dawei & He, Xiaogang, 2022. "How does broadband infrastructure promote entrepreneurship in China: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10).
    15. Tianlei Pi & Haoxuan Hu & Jingyi Lu & Xue Chen, 2022. "The Analysis of Fintech Risks in China: Based on Fuzzy Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, April.
    16. Hwa-Sung Kim, 2023. "Effects of ambiguity on innovation strategies," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, December.
    17. Lin, Tse-Chun & Pursiainen, Vesa, 2023. "Gender differences in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    18. Guo, Pin & Zhang, Cheng, 2023. "The impact of bank FinTech on liquidity creation: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Hiranya Dissanayake & Catalin Popescu & Anuradha Iddagoda, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Financial Technology: Unveiling the Research Landscape," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Zhao, Yang & Goodell, John W. & Wang, Yong & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2023. "Fintech, macroprudential policies and bank risk: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fintech; banking; P2P loans; crowdfunding; alternative currencies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:brccej:v:6:y:2021:i:4:p:67-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina GANESCU (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.univcb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.