IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bps/jspath/v1y2024i3id4923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing the Quality of Fog/Mist Images by Comparing the Effectiveness of Kalman Filter and Adaptive Filter for Noise Reduction

Author

Listed:
  • T. Srinivasulu
  • J. Joselin Jeya Sheela

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to enhance the precision of fog and mist noise reduction in photographsby introducing a novel Kalman filter and comparing its performance to that of an Adaptive filter. Materialsand Methods: For this investigation, the research dataset was sourced from the Kaggle database system. Usingtwenty iteration samples (ten for Group 1 and ten for Group 2), involving a total of 1240 samples, the efficacyof fog and mist noise elimination with improved accuracy was assessed. This evaluation was conductedemploying a G-power of 0.8, a 95% confidence interval, and alpha and beta values of 0.05 and 0.2,respectively. The determination of the sample size was based on the outcomes of these calculations. The novelKalman filter and the Adaptive filter, both utilizing the same number of data samples (N=10), were employedfor fog and mist noise removal from images. Notably, the Kalman filter exhibited a higher accuracy rate.Results: The novel Kalman filter showcased a success rate of 96.34%, outperforming the Adaptive filter'ssuccess rate of 93.78%. This difference in performance is statistically significant. The study's significancethreshold was set at p=.001 (p<0.05), confirming the significance of the hypothesis. This analysis was carriedout through an independent sample T-test. Conclusion: In conclusion, the proposed Kalman filter model,achieving an accuracy rate of 96.34%, demonstrates superior performance compared to the Adaptive filter,which yielded an accuracy rate of 93.78%. This comparison underscores the efficacy of the Kalman filter inthe context of image noise removal.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Srinivasulu & J. Joselin Jeya Sheela, 2024. "Enhancing the Quality of Fog/Mist Images by Comparing the Effectiveness of Kalman Filter and Adaptive Filter for Noise Reduction," SPAST Reports, SPAST Foundation, vol. 1(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:bps:jspath:v:1:y:2024:i:3:id:4923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://spast.org/article/view/4923/296
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bps:jspath:v:1:y:2024:i:3:id:4923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Srinesh Singh Thakur (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://spast.org/ojspath/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.