IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bps/jspath/v1y2024i3id4918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting Postpartum Depression Stages in New Mothers: A Comparative Study of Novel LSTM-CNN vs. Random Forest

Author

Listed:
  • P. Srivatsav
  • S. Nanthini

Abstract

A Novel long-short term memory with convolutional neural networks (LSTM-CNN) is used to predictpostpartum depression and compared it with Random Forest (RF) Algorithm. Materials and Methods: For thisresearch two groups were taken: The Novel Long-Short Term Memory with Convolutional Neural Networks(LSTM-CNN) and for comparison the Random Forest (RF) Algorithm was considered. After carefulconsideration each with a sample size of 20 to help in this research. Results: The outcomes of the study areshown in the following table (LSTM-CNN). The mean accuracy of the LSTM -CNN is 77.75% and theRandom Forest (RF) Algorithm model is 72.12%, respectively. The significance of the Independent samplet-test is evident with a p-value of 0.04 (p < 0.05), underscoring the statistical significance of the comparisonbetween the LSTM-CNN model and the Random Forest algorithm in the study. Conclusion: The LSTM-CNNtechnique outperformed the Random Forest (RF) Algorithm and other machine learning algorithms in termsof accuracy, and deep learning algorithms have generally showed promise in the prediction of Postpartumdepression.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Srivatsav & S. Nanthini, 2024. "Detecting Postpartum Depression Stages in New Mothers: A Comparative Study of Novel LSTM-CNN vs. Random Forest," SPAST Reports, SPAST Foundation, vol. 1(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:bps:jspath:v:1:y:2024:i:3:id:4918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://spast.org/article/view/4918/303
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Neural Networks; Prediction;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bps:jspath:v:1:y:2024:i:3:id:4918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Srinesh Singh Thakur (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://spast.org/ojspath/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.