Author
Listed:
- Lamandini Marco
(Professor of Law, University of Bologna. Member of the SRB Appeal Panel and former member and Chair of the Joint Board of Appeal for the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs). The views in this paper are expressed in a personal capacity only, and do not purport to represent the views of any of the institutions the author is or has been affiliated with. This publication is part of the line of research within PRIN 2020-2023, Main Researcher: Prof. Marco Lamandini.)
- Muñoz David Ramos
(Professor of Law, University Carlos III of Madrid. Alternate Member of the Appeal Panel for the Single Resolution Board, and of the Joint Board of Appeal for the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs). The views in this paper are expressed in a personal capacity only, and do not purport to represent the views of any of the institutions the author is or has been affiliated with. This publication is part of the line of research within PRIN 2020-2023, Main Researcher: Prof. Marco Lamandini, and Project PID2020-114549RB-I00 of the Spanish State Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation Projects 2017 – 2020. Business and Markets: Digital (R)evolution, Integrity and Sustainability and its assimilation by Private, Regulatory and Competition Law. Principal Researchers: Profs. David Ramos-Muñoz and Antonio Robles.)
Abstract
Within the institutional architecture for financial supervision within the EU, courts coexist with quasi-courts, i. e., review bodies like the ESAs Joint Board of Appeal, the SSM’s Administrative Board of Review (ABoR) and the SRB’s Appeal Panel. This has parallels e. g. US Administrative Law Judges (ALJs). Some argue that this flight away from courts is justified because administrative law and procedure are more flexible. Yet administrative mechanisms are deceptively simple. This paper offers a cautionary tale about the complexities of all quasi-judicial arrangements and their competing and complementary role with courts and presents an analysis of the European framework from both a functional and a comparative perspective.
Suggested Citation
Lamandini Marco & Muñoz David Ramos, 2023.
"A promise kept? The first years of experience of the Appeal Panel of the SRB,"
Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft (ZBB) / Journal of Banking Law and Banking (JBB), RWS Verlag, vol. 35(3), pages 158-168, June.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:zfbrbw:v:35:y:2023:i:3:p:158-168:n:2
DOI: 10.15375/zbb-2023-0304
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:zfbrbw:v:35:y:2023:i:3:p:158-168:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rws-verlag.de/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.