IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/zfbrbw/v32y2020i2p77-87n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Verteilung der Aufsichtskompetenzen in der Bankenunion

Author

Listed:
  • Tröger Tobias

    (Dr. iur., LL.M. (Harvard), Universitätsprofessor an der Goethe Universität Frankfurt/M., Leiter des Forschungsbereichs „Law and Finance“ am Leibnizinstitut für Finanzmarktforschung Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (LIF SAFE))

  • Tönningsen Gerrit

    (Dr. iur., Rechtsanwalt Hengeler Mueller, Frankfurt/M.)

Abstract

Mit der Errichtung des Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) hat der europäische Gesetzbgeber die Aufsichtslandschaft der Eurozone umgewälzt und prudentielle Verantwortlichkeiten bei der Europäischen Zentralbank (EZB) konzentriert. Die fundamentale kompetenzielle Neuordnung wirft ebenso grundsätzliche wie praxisrelevante Fragen zur effizienten Verteilung aufsichtlicher Zuständigkeiten im europäischen Mehrebenensystem auf. Diesen geht der vorliegende Beitrag aus Anlass des L-Bank Verfahrens vor den Unionsgerichten nach. Ziel ist dabei nicht nur, das Urteil kritisch zu würdigen, sondern auch einen über den konkreten Einzelfall hinausweisenden, normativen Leitstern für die Kompetenzabgrenzung zwischen EZB und nationalen Aufsichtsbehörden zu entwickeln.

Suggested Citation

  • Tröger Tobias & Tönningsen Gerrit, 2020. "Verteilung der Aufsichtskompetenzen in der Bankenunion," Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft (ZBB) / Journal of Banking Law and Banking (JBB), RWS Verlag, vol. 32(2), pages 77-87, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:zfbrbw:v:32:y:2020:i:2:p:77-87:n:3
    DOI: 10.15375/zbb-2020-0203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15375/zbb-2020-0203
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15375/zbb-2020-0203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joosen, Bart & Pulgar Ezquerra, Juana & Tröger, Tobias, 2024. "10 years of Banking Union case law: How did CJEU judgments shape supervision and resolution practice in the Banking Union?," SAFE White Paper Series 105, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:zfbrbw:v:32:y:2020:i:2:p:77-87:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rws-verlag.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.