Author
Listed:
- Gooch Elizabeth
(US Federal Economist, Washington, DC, USA)
- Kim Steven
(Department of Mathematics and Statistics, California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA, USA)
- Sobrepena Nicholas
(US Federal Statistician, Washington, DC, USA)
- Goethe Stone
(Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA)
- Eckstrand Eric
(Department of Operations Research, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA)
Abstract
The current United States National Defense Strategy prioritizes strategic competition with Russia and China, whereas for the previous two decades, the priority was counter-terrorism. This research aims to measure the extent to which competition among great powers is intensifying and identify where such intensification is taking place. To achieve this, we utilize a large, open-source dataset called GDELT 2.0, which provides an archive of global news articles. We calculate the entropy for local press coverage of great powers (e.g., the United States, China, Russia, France, and India) across 96 African and Asian nations to measure static competition levels. Additionally, we identify African and Asian nations where competition levels have changed significantly between 2015 and 2020. Our findings show that seven countries are experiencing increased competition among great powers, whereas seven other countries experience increased domination by one great power. When we aggregate the data geographically, we find that Southeast Asia is the only subregion where there is a significant decrease in competition. Our results align with the primary concern of the National Defense Strategy: that American influence is decreasing. Specifically, we have identified increased competition across Africa and increased domination across Asia. These trends are due to a relatively higher reporting of Chinese in-country public and private entities between 2015 and 2020.
Suggested Citation
Gooch Elizabeth & Kim Steven & Sobrepena Nicholas & Goethe Stone & Eckstrand Eric, 2024.
"The Great Powers Competition and Increasing Entropy in the Local Media Across Africa and Asia,"
Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 309-350.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:15:y:2024:i:3:p:309-350:n:1001
DOI: 10.1515/spp-2023-0048
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:15:y:2024:i:3:p:309-350:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.