IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/soeuro/v67y2019i3p369-392n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Administrative Legacy and the River Mura Border Dispute between Slovenia and Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Zajc Marko

    (Research Associate at the Institute of Contemporary History, Kongresni trg 1, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Set at the intersection between political history and environmental history, this article shows the significance of administrative legacy and natural dynamics of rivers in the landscape for creating (and solving) border disputes. In 2006, Slovenia and Croatia engaged in such a dispute regarding the exact course of the border near the River Mura in the vicinity of the villages of Hotiza (Slovenia) and Sv. Martin na Muri (Croatia). After giving an overview of the Slovenian-Croatian border disputes between 1992 and 2019, the author analyses the border dispute around the River Mura. He then shows how the history of the river’s regulations, of the Habsburg and Yugoslav land survey activities, as well as of the previous border disputes on the river are entangled in the current dispute.

Suggested Citation

  • Zajc Marko, 2019. "Administrative Legacy and the River Mura Border Dispute between Slovenia and Croatia," Comparative Southeast European Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 67(3), pages 369-392, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:soeuro:v:67:y:2019:i:3:p:369-392:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/soeu-2019-0027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2019-0027
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/soeu-2019-0027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:soeuro:v:67:y:2019:i:3:p:369-392:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.