IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sndecm/v26y2022i2p191-203n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for stationarity with covariates: more powerful tests with non-normal errors

Author

Listed:
  • Nazlioglu Saban

    (Department of International Trade & Finance, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey)

  • Lee Junsoo

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Nisantasi University, Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Karul Cagin

    (Department of Econometrics, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey)

  • You Yu

    (Advanced Institute of Finance and Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China)

Abstract

Previous studies suggested that the power of unit root and stationarity tests can be improved by augmenting a testing regression model with stationary covariates. However, one practical problem arises since such procedures require finding the variables that satisfy certain conditions. The difficulty of finding satisfactory covariate has hindered using such desired tests. In this paper, we suggest using non-normal errors to construct stationary covariates in testing for stationarity. We do not need to look for outside variables, but we utilize the distributional information embodied in a time series of interest. The terms driven from the information on non-normal errors can be employed as valid stationary covariates. For this, we adopt the framework of stationarity tests of Jansson (Jansson, M. 2004. “Stationarity Testing with Covariates.” Econometric Theory 20: 56–94). We show that the tests can achieve much-improved power. We then present the response surface function estimates to facilitate computing the critical values and the corresponding p-values. We investigate the nature of shocks to the US macro-economic series using the updated Nelson–Plosser data set through our new testing procedure. We find stronger evidence of non-stationarity than their univariate counterparts that do not use the covariates.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazlioglu Saban & Lee Junsoo & Karul Cagin & You Yu, 2022. "Testing for stationarity with covariates: more powerful tests with non-normal errors," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 26(2), pages 191-203, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sndecm:v:26:y:2022:i:2:p:191-203:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/snde-2019-0038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2019-0038
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/snde-2019-0038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Nelson–Plosser; non-normality; RALS; stationarity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sndecm:v:26:y:2022:i:2:p:191-203:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.