IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v6y2007i1n35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Divergence Time Estimation in Phylogenetics: More Taxa vs. Longer Sequences

Author

Listed:
  • Svennblad Bodil

    (Uppsala University)

  • Britton Tom

    (Stockholm University)

Abstract

Maximum Likelihood (ML) is used as a standard method for estimating divergence times in phylogenetic trees. The method is consistent and hence the precision can be improved by analyzing longer sequences. In this paper we show that the precision can be improved also by including more taxa to the existing tree. It is a theoretical study, complemented with simulations, showing that the gain in precision is faster with increasing sequence length than with increasing number of taxa.We further compare the results of estimating divergence times using Maximum Likelihood with the much faster and less complex estimation method of Mean Path Length (MPL), which works with the evolution model of Jukes-Cantor (1969). It is shown that MPL is as good as ML in estimating divergence times of nodes that are located near the root in the tree, but ML is better in estimating the divergence times of nodes lower down.

Suggested Citation

  • Svennblad Bodil & Britton Tom, 2007. "Improving Divergence Time Estimation in Phylogenetics: More Taxa vs. Longer Sequences," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:6:y:2007:i:1:n:35
    DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1313
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1544-6115.1313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:6:y:2007:i:1:n:35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.