Author
Listed:
- Thallman R. Mark
(USDA, ARS, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center)
- Hanford Kathryn J
(USDA, ARS, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Lincoln)
- Kachman Stephen D
(Dept. of Statistics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln)
- Van Vleck L. Dale
(USDA, ARS, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Lincoln)
Abstract
Gametic models for fitting breeding values at QTL as random effects in outbred populations have become popular because they require few assumptions about the number and distribution of QTL alleles segregating. The covariance matrix of the gametic effects has an inverse that is sparse and can be constructed rapidly by a simple algorithm, provided that all individuals have marker data, but not otherwise. An equivalent model, in which the joint distribution of QTL breeding values and marker genotypes is considered, was shown to generate a covariance matrix with a sparse inverse that can be constructed rapidly with a simple algorithm. This result makes more feasible including QTL as random effects in analyses of large pedigrees for QTL detection and marker assisted selection. Such analyses often use algorithms that rely upon sparseness of the mixed model equations and require the inverse of the covariance matrix, but not the covariance matrix itself. With the proposed model, each individual has two random effects for each possible unordered marker genotype for that individual. Therefore, individuals with marker data have two random effects, just as with the gametic model. To keep the notation and the derivation simple, the method is derived under the assumptions of a single linked marker and that the pedigree does not contain loops. The algorithm could be applied, as an approximate method, to pedigrees that contain loops.
Suggested Citation
Thallman R. Mark & Hanford Kathryn J & Kachman Stephen D & Van Vleck L. Dale, 2004.
"Sparse Inverse of Covariance Matrix of QTL Effects with Incomplete Marker Data,"
Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, November.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:3:y:2004:i:1:n:30
DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1048
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:3:y:2004:i:1:n:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.