Author
Listed:
- Lee Hae Woo
(Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA)
- Lawton Carl
(Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA)
- Na Young Jeong
(Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA)
- Yoon Seongkyu
(Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA)
Abstract
In omics studies aimed at the early detection and diagnosis of cancer, bioinformatics tools play a significant role when analyzing high dimensional, complex datasets, as well as when identifying a small set of biomarkers. However, in many cases, there are ambiguities in the robustness and the consistency of the discovered biomarker sets, since the feature selection methods often lead to irreproducible results. To address this, both the stability and the classification power of several chemometrics-based feature selection algorithms were evaluated using the Monte Carlo sampling technique, aiming at finding the most suitable feature selection methods for early cancer detection and biomarker discovery. To this end, two data sets were analyzed, which comprised of MALDI-TOF-MS and LC/TOF-MS spectra measured on serum samples in order to diagnose ovarian cancer. Using these datasets, the stability and the classification power of multiple feature subsets found by different feature selection methods were quantified by varying either the number of selected features, or the number of samples in the training set, with special emphasis placed on the property of stability. The results show that high consistency does not necessarily guarantee high predictive power. In addition, differences in the stability, as well as agreement in feature lists between several feature selection methods, depend on several factors, such as the number of available samples, feature sizes, quality of the information in the dataset, etc. Among the tested methods, only the variable importance in projection (VIP)-based method shows complementary properties, providing both highly consistent and accurate subsets of features. In addition, successive projection analysis (SPA) was excellent with regards to maintaining high stability over a wide range of experimental conditions. The stability of several feature selection methods is highly variable, stressing the importance of making the proper choice among feature selection methods. Therefore, rather than evaluating the selected features using only classification accuracy, stability measurements should be examined as well to improve the reliability of biomarker discovery.
Suggested Citation
Lee Hae Woo & Lawton Carl & Na Young Jeong & Yoon Seongkyu, 2013.
"Robustness of chemometrics-based feature selection methods in early cancer detection and biomarker discovery,"
Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 207-223.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:12:y:2013:i:2:p:207-223:n:1004
DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2012-0067
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:12:y:2013:i:2:p:207-223:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.