Author
Listed:
- Forcheh Anyiawung Chiara
(Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Universiteit Hasselt)
- Verbeke Geert
(Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Universiteit Hasselt)
- Kasim Adetayo
(Durham University)
- Lin Dan
(Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Universiteit Hasselt)
- Shkedy Ziv
(Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Universiteit Hasselt)
- Talloen Willem
(Janssen Pharmaceutica N. V.)
- Göhlmann Hinrich WH
(Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development)
- Clement Lieven
(Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Universiteit Hasselt)
Abstract
Illumina bead arrays are microarrays that contain a random number of technical replicates (beads) for every probe (bead type) within the same array. Typically around 30 beads are placed at random positions on the array surface, which opens unique opportunities for quality control. Most preprocessing methods for Illumina bead arrays are ported from the Affymetrix microarray platform and ignore the availability of the technical replicates. The large number of beads for a particular bead type on the same array, however, should be highly correlated, otherwise they just measure noise and can be removed from the downstream analysis. Hence, filtering bead types can be considered as an important step of the preprocessing procedure for Illumina platform. This paper proposes a filtering method for Illumina bead arrays, which builds upon the mixed model framework. Bead types are called informative/non-informative (I/NI) based on a trade-off between within and between array variabilities. The method is illustrated on a publicly available Illumina Spike-in data set (Dunning et al., 2008) and we also show that filtering results in a more powerful analysis of differentially expressed genes.
Suggested Citation
Forcheh Anyiawung Chiara & Verbeke Geert & Kasim Adetayo & Lin Dan & Shkedy Ziv & Talloen Willem & Göhlmann Hinrich WH & Clement Lieven, 2012.
"Gene Filtering in the Analysis of Illumina Microarray Experiments,"
Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:11:y:2012:i:2:n:3
DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1710
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:11:y:2012:i:2:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.