IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/rlecon/v2y2006i2n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Theory of Price Discrimination via Transactions Bundling: An Assessment of the Policy Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Dassiou Xeni

    (Dept. of Economics, City University, London)

  • Glycopantis Dionysious

    (Dept. of Economics, City University, London)

Abstract

This paper discusses specific cases in financial regulation, competition law and legal rules in procurement, in light of the economic concept of the efficiency of mixed bundling as derived in our theoretical models. We assess the appropriateness of the existing rules, and also discuss whether there is a need to reform specific legal or regulatory rules in light of the efficiency discussion. We examine the U.S. legal and regulatory framework in government procurement, the offsets case, and finally we look into financial regulation in the case of bundled brokerage and soft commission arrangements on both sides of the Atlantic. The novelty of our models is that we analyze transactions mixed bundling in the cases of monopoly, monopsony and exchange. Additionally, for the cases of monopsony and exchange we consider goods of varying degrees of quality certainty. The common result is the local optimality of the bundling of transactions in terms of expected profits for the price-setting firm, and an overall increase in the level of trade in the goods bundled. In the real-life cases examined, we found that in most instances the authorities have decided that if the practice of pure bundling is present, to replace it with mixed bundling, rather than ban bundling altogether. This practice is correct, as according to our models mixed bundling is efficiency-enhancing (both in profits and in trade volumes). On the other hand, the policy implications derived from our models based on the presence of quality uncertainty suggest that allowing the bundling of dissimilar tasks is beneficial rather than damaging to trade, especially if the goods bundled are of diverse degrees of quality certainty. This is at odds with the current legal and regulation approach to bundling practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Dassiou Xeni & Glycopantis Dionysious, 2006. "The Economic Theory of Price Discrimination via Transactions Bundling: An Assessment of the Policy Implications," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 323-348, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:2:y:2006:i:2:n:5
    DOI: 10.2202/1555-5879.1041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1041
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1555-5879.1041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dassiou, Xeni & Glycopantis, Dionysius & Stavropoulou, Charitini, 2009. "Bundling in General Markets and in Health Care Systems," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 47-68.
    2. Dassiou, X. & Glycopantis, Dionysius, 2012. "Transactions Bundling in Monopsonistic Markets; Theory and Numerical Implications," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 105-131.
    3. Xeni Dassiou & Dionysius Glycopantis, 2012. "Optimal Decisions in Two-stage Bundling," Chapters, in: Joseph E. Harrington Jr & Yannis Katsoulacos (ed.), Recent Advances in the Analysis of Competition Policy and Regulation, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Dassiou, Xeni & Glycopantis, Dionysius, 2008. "Price discrimination through transactions bundling: The case of monopsony," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(7-8), pages 672-681, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:2:y:2006:i:2:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.