IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/pewipo/v19y2018i3p226-231n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indirekte Kolonialherrschaft und demokratische Einstellungen: Analyse eines natürlichen Experiments in Namibia

Author

Listed:
  • Lechler Marie

    (Lehrstuhl für Bevölkerungs-ökonomie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Schackstr. 4, D-80539 MünchenLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenLehrstuhl für BevölkerungsökonomieSchackstr. 4D-80539 MünchenGermany)

Abstract

In diesem Beitrag beschreibt Marie Lechler die langfristigen Folgen indirekter Kolonialherrschaft in Namibia. In einer Analyse gemeinsam mit Lachlan McNamee hat sie den Effekt mithilfe eines räumlichen Regressions-Diskontinuitäten-Ansatzes identifiziert. Dieser nutzt die willkürliche Teilung Namibias Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts in einen direkt und einen indirekt beherrschten Teil. Im indirekt regierten Teil Namibias überließen die Kolonialmächte traditionellen Führern die Verwaltung. Diese haben auch lange nach dem Ende der Kolonialzeit einen großen Einfluss in ihren Gemeinschaften. Die empirische Analyse zeigt, dass Menschen im ehemals indirekt regierten Teil weniger demokratisch eingestellt sind und dass die Wahlbeteiligung in diesem Teil des Landes geringer ausfällt als im ehemals direkt regierten Teil.

Suggested Citation

  • Lechler Marie, 2018. "Indirekte Kolonialherrschaft und demokratische Einstellungen: Analyse eines natürlichen Experiments in Namibia," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 19(3), pages 226-231, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:pewipo:v:19:y:2018:i:3:p:226-231:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/pwp-2018-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2018-0008
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/pwp-2018-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Demokratische Einstellungen; (Räumlicher) Regressions-Diskontinuitäten-Ansatz; Kolonialgeschichte; Namibia; Demokratische Institutionen;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F54 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - Colonialism; Imperialism; Postcolonialism
    • N27 - Economic History - - Financial Markets and Institutions - - - Africa; Oceania
    • N47 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - Africa; Oceania
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pewipo:v:19:y:2018:i:3:p:226-231:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.