IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/pepspp/v9y2003i1n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Brams' Approaches to Conflict Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chung Yun Ho

    (Korea Development Institute)

Abstract

Studies on conflict management have been done for a long time under different names. Conflict itself deserves to be examined not only in many real sectors but in academic fields as well, and many scholars have tried to understand why conflict is inevitable in everyday life and to explore how it can be resolved. The study on how to resolve conflicts is referred as conflict management, and many other people call it in different names such as bargaining, negotiation, mediation or arbitration, although each of these has a unique characteristic distinguished from the others. The common purpose of these studies is to learn how to reach an agreement on resolving the "conflict" among the involved parties. Schelling (1960), in his celebrated book, has claimed that the strategy of conflict is not concerned with the efficient application of force but with the exploitation of potential force. Winning in a conflict is not from a competition among the parties involved but largely from bargaining. In the same line, we take the conflict management in this study. We try to answer how a conflict situation can be resolved in a cooperative way of conflict management.

Suggested Citation

  • Chung Yun Ho, 2003. "On Brams' Approaches to Conflict Analysis," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-48, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:9:y:2003:i:1:n:2
    DOI: 10.2202/1554-8597.1059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-8597.1059
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1554-8597.1059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:9:y:2003:i:1:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.