IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/pepspp/v5y1999i2n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential Savings from Reform of DOE Nuclear Weapons Stewardship and from Nuclear Stockpile Reductions

Author

Listed:
  • Mello Greg

    (Los Alamos Study Group)

  • Lichterman Andrew

    (Los Alamos Study Group)

  • Weida William

    (Global Resource Action Center for the Environment)

Abstract

The first section of this paper presents our general conclusions and recommendations. These conclusions are supported in Appendix I by a detailed, line-by-line analysis of the Stockpile Stewardship and Management budget. This appendix also includes our rationale for each of the suggested cuts. Appendix II calculates cuts to the DOD budget that would accompany the Stockpile Stewardship cuts we propose. Appendix III shows specific differences in the assumptions about Stockpile Stewardship made by the authors and by the DOE Laboratories.The views presented in this paper represent those of the authors and not those of any other organization, publication, or entity.

Suggested Citation

  • Mello Greg & Lichterman Andrew & Weida William, 1999. "Potential Savings from Reform of DOE Nuclear Weapons Stewardship and from Nuclear Stockpile Reductions," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-38, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:5:y:1999:i:2:n:2
    DOI: 10.2202/1554-8597.1021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-8597.1021
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1554-8597.1021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:5:y:1999:i:2:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.