IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/pepspp/v5y1999i2n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demobilization from the Cold War 1990-1998: Lessons of U.S. Conversion Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Bischak Greg

    (Appalachian Regional Commission)

Abstract

This report examines the size, composition and effectiveness of conversion and transition assistance programs in the United States from 1990 to 1998. The programs are evaluated within the context of the unfolding and shifting debate about the appropriateness of public sector initiatives to reinvest defense savings in other public objectives, to promote, where possible, the conversion of defense resources and facilities to relevant civilian applications, and to minimize the social and economic dislocation of defense downsizing. In addition this study will examine how the debate over post-Cold War national security requirements has raised questions about the extent to which production lines should be kept running either through domestic procurement or arms exports to maintain the defense industrial base, especially so-called "defense unique" capabilities such as those dedicated to submarine, aircraft or tank production.The extent of defense budget reductions and the manner in which defense savings are used for other public purposes are key determinants of the scope and impact of the broadbased conversion of the United States defense economy. Thus, we turn to examine the size of defense cuts since the end of the Cold War and then analyze how these savings often termed the peace dividend-have been used.

Suggested Citation

  • Bischak Greg, 1999. "Demobilization from the Cold War 1990-1998: Lessons of U.S. Conversion Policy," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-42, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:5:y:1999:i:2:n:1
    DOI: 10.2202/1554-8597.1020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-8597.1020
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1554-8597.1020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:5:y:1999:i:2:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.