Author
Listed:
- Arboleda-Ariza Juan Carlos
(Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, Programa de Psicología de la Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Colombia)
- Prosser Bravo Gabriel
(Department of Psychology of the Faculty of Social Sciences (FACSO) University of Chile, Santiago, Chile)
- Mora-Gámez Fredy
(Linköping University (Sweden), Grupo Interdisciplinario de Estudios de Género at Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Linkoping, Sweden)
Abstract
The Colombian State and subversive groups have made attempts to build peace by the establishment of accords since the 1980s. Recently, the signature of a peace accord by former president Santos and the FARC-EP leadership in 2016, has come along with changes in the interpretative frameworks of the conflict and the emergence of new institutions, forms of subjectivity and collective meanings around peace. Nowadays, Colombia is in the transition from being a country at war to a peaceful nation. In this transition, the discourse of victims and state representatives about peace and conflict are predominant in the literature. This article characterizes the simultaneously coexisting discourses about peace and conflict in former combatants. We conducted a discourse analysis of 19 semi-structured interviews with former members of paramilitaries and guerrillas. The results are clustered into two categories: absent peace, in which peace is seen as the lack of something that was missed and lost; and the indefinite war, where peace can be hardly imagined due to the permanence of conflict and longevity of violence. The overlooked angle of the narratives of combatants about peace and conflict is discussed, and the findings are suggested as potential guidelines to navigate displaced and divergent accounts of peace and conflict in transition societies.
Suggested Citation
Arboleda-Ariza Juan Carlos & Prosser Bravo Gabriel & Mora-Gámez Fredy, 2020.
"Absent Peace in Colombia: A Study of Transition Discourses in Former Combatants,"
Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 26(4), pages 1-21, December.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:26:y:2020:i:4:p:21:n:2
DOI: 10.1515/peps-2019-0042
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:26:y:2020:i:4:p:21:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.