IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v70y2019i1p125-165n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Klimaschutz auf Kosten der Armen? Vorschläge für eine markt- und sozialverträgliche Umsetzung von CO2-Steuern und des Emissionshandels

Author

Listed:
  • Wolf Stephan

    (Professur für Kontextuale Ökonomik und ökonomische Bildung Universität SiegenSiegenGermany)

  • Goldschmidt Nils

    (Lehrstuhl für kontextuale Ökonomik und ökonomische Bildung, Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Wirt-schaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsrecht, Universität SiegenSiegenGermany)

Abstract

In this paper, we suggest a two-step approach to German climate policy. As a first step to be implemented in 2020, Germany should introduce a CO2 tax on fossil fuels which are consumed for private mobility and heating purposes. These emissions are currently not included in the EU-ETS cap. Similar to the Swiss carbon tax system, we suggest returning the revenue to the population. Unlike in Switzerland, though, direct refunds should concentrate on the poorest third of the German households and comprise only half of the tax yield. The other half should be spent on improving public transportation in rural areas and on subsidies for energy efficiency measures in apartment buildings. In accordance with the principles of a Social Market Economy, these measures would reconcile climate protection – as requested by intergenerational justice – and social justice: Individual contributions to climate protection depend on financial means. From 2030 on, Germany should start implementing a Personal Carbon Trading System to replace the tax solution – step two of our proposal. The tax solution creates the time slot needed for preparing the technically and legally more demanding consumer-based emissions trading system. Often it is claimed that such a consumer-based scheme is not feasible due to transaction and administration costs. Given the late progress in information technologies, we think most of these problems can be solved by now. Therefore, we think the implementation of a Personal Carbon Trading System is feasible, and it would provide the following advantages over a tax: the emission target is surely met, it is compatible with the existing EU-ETS, and each consumer directly realizes what emissions he or she is responsible for.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolf Stephan & Goldschmidt Nils, 2019. "Klimaschutz auf Kosten der Armen? Vorschläge für eine markt- und sozialverträgliche Umsetzung von CO2-Steuern und des Emissionshandels," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 70(1), pages 125-165, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:70:y:2019:i:1:p:125-165:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2020-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2020-0008
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2020-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CO2 Tax; Cap & Trade; Personal Carbon Trading System; EU-ETS; Redistribution; Poverty; Intergenerational Justice; CO2-Steuer; Emissionshandel; Personal Carbon Trading System; EU-ETS; Umverteilung; Armut; Generationengerechtigkeit; CO2 Tax; Cap & Trade; Personal Carbon Trading System; EU-ETS; Redistribution; Poverty; Intergenerational Justice;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • H31 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Household
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:70:y:2019:i:1:p:125-165:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.