IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v64y2013i1p253-274n13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ordnungspolitische und Sachprobleme der Energiewende / Problems of the turnaround in energy policy in Germany after 2011

Author

Listed:
  • Ströbele Wolfgang

Abstract

The aims of the turnaround in energy policy (“Energiewende”) in Germany after 2011 have no solid foundation. Meanwhile, the share of German carbon emissions is only 2,5 % of world′s emissions. So the benefits of the extent and speed of German energy policy is doubtful. The political enforced division of a decreasing competitive market on the one side and a system of subsidies on the other side in the electricity market leads not only to a large volume of subsidies, but also to problems of the residual market with “classic” power generation. This part of the supply side is still necessary since a very large part of renewable generation is volatile. But the market incentives to build new capacities or to continue with old capacities are too weak. Therefore we have a discussion on capacity markets, which require additional subsidies. In fact, we would need a parallel building of renewable capacities, north-south expansion of the grid and simultaneously a construction of very large storage capacities. Germany does the first very strongly, lacks behind with the second, and the third requirement still is cloud-cuckoo-land. This will cause risks to the safety of the system. Concerning the other markets, we have a lot of interventions into the transport and heat sector, which in many areas are contradictory. Instead of trusting into market signals, the government intervenes at too many places.

Suggested Citation

  • Ströbele Wolfgang, 2013. "Ordnungspolitische und Sachprobleme der Energiewende / Problems of the turnaround in energy policy in Germany after 2011," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 64(1), pages 253-274, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:64:y:2013:i:1:p:253-274:n:13
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2013-0113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2013-0113
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2013-0113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hillard G. Huntington, 2011. "The Policy Implications of Energy-Efficiency Cost Curves," The Energy Journal, , vol. 32(1_suppl), pages 7-22, June.
    2. Khalfallah Mohamed Haikel, 2011. "A Game Theoretic Model for Generation Capacity Adequacy: Comparison Between Investment Incentive Mechanisms in Electricity Markets," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 117-158.
    3. Haikel Khalfallah, 2011. "A Game theoretic model for generation capacity adequacy: Comparison between investment incentive mechanisms in electricity markets," Post-Print halshs-00743195, HAL.
    4. Liebau, Björn & Ströbele, Wolfgang J., 2011. "The Shortcomings of the Architecture of the German Electricity Market," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 21-28, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Todd D. Gerarden & Richard G. Newell & Robert N. Stavins, 2017. "Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1486-1525, December.
    2. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00816355 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mulder, Machiel & Schoonbeek, Lambert, 2013. "Decomposing changes in competition in the Dutch electricity market through the residual supply index," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 100-107.
    4. Heather Klemick & Elizabeth Kopits & Keith Sargent & Ann Wolverton, 2014. "Heavy-Duty Trucks and the Energy Efficiency Paradox," NCEE Working Paper Series 201402, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Jan 2014.
    5. Laslett, Dean & Carter, Craig & Creagh, Chris & Jennings, Philip, 2017. "A large-scale renewable electricity supply system by 2030: Solar, wind, energy efficiency, storage and inertia for the South West Interconnected System (SWIS) in Western Australia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 713-731.
    6. Rious, Vincent & Perez, Yannick & Roques, Fabien, 2015. "Which electricity market design to encourage the development of demand response?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 128-138.
    7. Mier, Mathias & Weissbart, Christoph, 2020. "Power markets in transition: Decarbonization, energy efficiency, and short-term demand response," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Wilkerson, Jordan T. & Cullenward, Danny & Davidian, Danielle & Weyant, John P., 2013. "End use technology choice in the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS): An analysis of the residential and commercial building sectors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 773-784.
    9. Poponi, Daniele & Basosi, Riccardo & Kurdgelashvili, Lado, 2021. "Subsidisation cost analysis of renewable energy deployment: A case study on the Italian feed-in tariff programme for photovoltaics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Cédric Clastres & Haikel Khalfallah, 2021. "Dynamic pricing efficiency with strategic retailers and consumers: An analytical analysis of short-term market interactions," Post-Print hal-03193212, HAL.
    11. Gerarden, Todd D. & Newell, Richard G. & Stavins, Robert N. & Stowe, Robert C., 2015. "An Assessment of the Energy-Efficiency Gap and Its Implications for Climate Change Policy," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 202116, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    12. Caroline Löffler & Harald Hecking, 2017. "Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curves of the Residential Heating Market: A Microeconomic Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(4), pages 915-947, December.
    13. repec:dgr:rugsom:13003-eef is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Mastropietro, Paolo & Herrero, Ignacio & Rodilla, Pablo & Batlle, Carlos, 2016. "A model-based analysis on the impact of explicit penalty schemes in capacity mechanisms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 406-417.
    15. Bublitz, Andreas & Keles, Dogan & Zimmermann, Florian & Fraunholz, Christoph & Fichtner, Wolf, 2018. "A survey on electricity market design: Insights from theory and real-world implementations of capacity remuneration mechanisms," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 27, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    16. Lynch, Muireann Á. & Devine, Mel, 2015. "Investment vs. Refurbishment: Examining Capacity Payment Mechanisms Using Mixed Complementarity Problems With Endogenous Probability," Papers WP507, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    17. Cédric Clastres & Haikel Khalfallah, 2020. "Retailers' strategies facing demand response and markets interactions," Working Papers hal-03167543, HAL.
    18. Lundmark, Robert, 2022. "Time-adjusted transaction costs for energy renovations for single-family house-owners," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Di Cosmo, Valeria & Lynch, Muireann Á., 2016. "Competition and the single electricity market: Which lessons for Ireland?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 40-47.
    20. Muireann A. Lynch and Mel T. Devine, 2017. "Investment vs. Refurbishment: Examining Capacity Payment Mechanisms Using Stochastic Mixed Complementarity Problems," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    21. Glotin, David & Bourgeois, Cyril & Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan & Quirion, Philippe, 2019. "Prediction is difficult, even when it's about the past: A hindcast experiment using Res-IRF, an integrated energy-economy model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(S1).
    22. Haikel Khalfallah & Vincent Rious, 2013. "A game theoretical analysis of the design options of the real-time electricity market," Post-Print halshs-00816355, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:64:y:2013:i:1:p:253-274:n:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.