IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v60y2009i1p23-52n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ist ‚Freiheit’ als ‚negative Freiheit’ ausreichend bestimmt? Die Positionen Friedrich August von Hayeks und Isaiah Berlins im Kontrast sowie ein Vorschlag zur Diskussion / Is ‚Liberty’ as ‚Negative Liberty’ Appropriately Conceptualised? The Positions of Friedrich August von Hayek and Isaiah Berlin in Comparison and a Proposal for Discussion

Author

Listed:
  • Groß Steffen W.

Abstract

Our article addresses the question whether ‘liberty’ is appropriately conceptualised as ‘negative liberty’. Based on a comparison of the ideas of Friedrich August von Hayek and Isaiah Berlin we outline how the idea of a negative concept of liberty did emerge as the dominant paradigm in the twentieth century. Against this background we develop the thesis that it is necessary to understand the complex interdependence between positive and negative aspects of freedom in order to arrive at a holistic, active understanding of the dynamic nature of freedom and the concepts used to define it.

Suggested Citation

  • Groß Steffen W., 2009. "Ist ‚Freiheit’ als ‚negative Freiheit’ ausreichend bestimmt? Die Positionen Friedrich August von Hayeks und Isaiah Berlins im Kontrast sowie ein Vorschlag zur Diskussion / Is ‚Liberty’ as ‚Negative Li," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 60(1), pages 23-52, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:60:y:2009:i:1:p:23-52:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2009-0104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2009-0104
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2009-0104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mhr:untord:urn:isbn:9783163449763 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Batthyány, Philipp, 2007. "Zwang als Grundübel in der Gesellschaft?," Untersuchungen zur Ordnungstheorie und Ordnungspolitik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen;Walter Eucken Institut, Freiburg, Germany, edition 1, volume 52, number urn:isbn:9783161493652, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weede Erich, 2015. "Von Hayek lernen: Wissen und Freiheit, Recht und Gesetzgebung / Learning from Hayek: Knowledge and Liberty, Law and Legislation," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 66(1), pages 81-96, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:60:y:2009:i:1:p:23-52:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.