IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v52y2001i1p63-74n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ex ante-Kontrolle versus ex post-Kontrolle im Recht der Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen

Author

Listed:
  • Möschel Wernhard

Abstract

The EU Commission plans to fundamentally change the competition law of the European Union. According to these plans, the current system of a prohibition in Art. 81 Sec. 1 of the Treaty with the possibility of an exemption subject to a decision according to Art. 81 Sec. 3 would be replaced by a system of an automatic statutory exemption. Article 81 Sec. 1 and Sec. 3 of the Treaty would then be directly applicable as one integrated rule. A prior examination by the competition authorities would not take place any more. This would be a change from an ex ante enforcement through prescreening to an ex post enforcement through deterrence. The author shows the mixture of elements of ex ante control and of ex post control in the German, the European and the US American legal systems. He assumes the proposals of the EU Commission to be risky in terms of competition policy. He tests this hypothesis against the criteria of transparency, legal certainty, coherency of legal enforcement, subsidiarity, deterrence effects and costs of enforcement. The logic of the proposals of the EU Commission implies the introduction of imprisonment as a sanction for antitrust offenses.

Suggested Citation

  • Möschel Wernhard, 2001. "Ex ante-Kontrolle versus ex post-Kontrolle im Recht der Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 52(1), pages 63-74, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:52:y:2001:i:1:p:63-74:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2001-0106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2001-0106
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2001-0106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:52:y:2001:i:1:p:63-74:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.