IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v51y2000i1p457-478n20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welthandelsordnung, regionale Teilordnungen und interregionale Klammerordnungen: Die handelspolitische Präsenz der EU in einer globalisierten und regionalisierten Weltwirtschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Papastamkos Georgios

Abstract

The article focuses on interdependencies between the multilateral trade order and regional and inter-regional partial orders. The tendency towards globalization has been reinforced with the institutionalization of the WTO. At the same time, regional cooperation and integration has also spread. The levels of action do not refer only to European integration, to NAFTA or to initiatives in exporting models from the EU and the USA; they also refer to the new movement of regionalism among developing countries which will enhance the co-operation among the states of the South. The interaction between globalism and regionalism is seen in two ways: One view holds that a concurrent elimination of barriers to trade on the regional level will bring about a gradual liberalization and adjustment of regulatory systems on the multilateral level, too. The opposite view holds that regionalization - particularly in a competitive commercial environment - is disruptive for the multilateral trade system. Both views stress the challenges for the WTO, especially the limits of its regulatory and disciplinary powers.The EU/EC plays an important role both in the multilateral system and in a regional context. The EU supports the so-called „Millennium Round“ of the WTO, maintains an extensive network of special relations with third states and has promoted regional integration in the Third World as an „horizontal instrument“ of its development policy. It has set up inter-regional orders to foster transregional co-operation as an instrument of trade or development policy. The attractiveness of the EC model is due inter alia to its experience in matters of integration, to its importance as a trade partner and to its commitments concerning development policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Papastamkos Georgios, 2000. "Welthandelsordnung, regionale Teilordnungen und interregionale Klammerordnungen: Die handelspolitische Präsenz der EU in einer globalisierten und regionalisierten Weltwirtschaft," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 51(1), pages 457-478, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:51:y:2000:i:1:p:457-478:n:20
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2000-0120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2000-0120
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2000-0120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard E. Baldwin, 1997. "The Causes of Regionalism," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 865-888, November.
    2. Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Jeffrey J. Schott, 1992. "North American Free Trade: Issues and Recommendations," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 71, January.
    3. C. Fred Bergsten, 1997. "Open Regionalism," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(5), pages 545-565, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burfisher, Mary E. & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2004. "Regionalism," MTID discussion papers 65, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Seidmann, Daniel J., 2009. "Preferential trading arrangements as strategic positioning," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 143-159, September.
    3. Bommer, Rolf, 1995. "Environmental policy and industrial competitiveness: The pollution haven hypothesis reconsidered," Discussion Papers, Series II 262, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    4. Pedro Moncarz & Marcelo Olarreaga & Marcel Vaillant, 2016. "Regionalism as Industrial Policy: Evidence from MERCOSUR," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 359-373, February.
    5. Austria, Myrna S., 2003. "East Asian Regional Cooperation: Approaches and Processes," Discussion Papers DP 2003-02, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    6. Festus Ebo Turkson, 2012. "Trade Agreements and Bilateral Trade in Sub-Saharan Africa: Estimating the Trade Effects of the EU-ACP PTA and RTAs," Discussion Papers 12/07, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    7. Austria, Myrna S., 2001. "Liberalization and Regional Integration: The Philippines' Strategy to Global Competitiveness," Discussion Papers DP 2001-09, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    8. Grether, Jean-Marie & Olarreaga, Marcelo, 1998. "Preferential and non-preferential trade flows in world trade," WTO Staff Working Papers ERAD-98-10, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    9. Lucian Cernat, 2001. "ASSESSING REGIONAL TRADE ARRANGEMENTS: ARE SOUTH–SOUTH RTAs MORE TRADE DIVERTING?," International Trade 0109001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Jaime MELO DE, 2005. "Regionalism and Developing Countries: A Primer," Working Papers 200510, CERDI.
    11. Woosik Moon, 2011. "Whither East Asian economic integration? Korea’s regionalization cum globalization strategy," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 29-42, November.
    12. Linda M. Aguilar, 1993. "NAFTA: a review of the issues," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 17(Jan), pages 12-20.
    13. Patricia Fernández-Kelly & Douglas S. Massey, 2007. "Borders for Whom? The Role of NAFTA in Mexico-U.S. Migration," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 610(1), pages 98-118, March.
    14. Baldwin, Richard Edward & Rieder , Roland, 2007. "A Test of Endogenous Trade Bloc Formation Theory on EU Data," East Asian Economic Review, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, vol. 11(2), pages 77-110, December.
    15. Thorstensen, Vera & Bresser Pereira, Luiz Carlos, 1995. "From MERCOSUR to American integration," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 1500.
    16. James W. Bono & David H. Wolpert, 2009. "Statistical prediction of the outcome of a noncooperative game," Working Papers 2009-20, American University, Department of Economics.
    17. Joyce Manchester & Warwick Mckibbin, 1995. "The global macroeconomics of NAFTA," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 203-223, July.
    18. George Manzano & Myrene Bedano, 2011. "Revisiting Sectoral Liberalization: An Alternative to the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific? Implications for the Philippines," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 18(1), pages 73-124, June.
    19. Jeronim Capaldo, 2014. "Trade Hallucination: Risks of Trade Facilitation and Suggestions for Implementation," GDAE Working Papers 14-02, GDAE, Tufts University.
    20. Angelina A. Kolomeytseva & Maria A. Maksakova, 2019. "Integration Potential in Energy Sector: Eurasian Economic Union Case," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 174-181.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:51:y:2000:i:1:p:457-478:n:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.