IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v16y2025i1p29-53n1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Giving Voice: Examining the Tactical Repertoires of Nonprofit Advocacy for Disadvantaged Populations

Author

Listed:
  • MacIndoe Heather

    (Public Policy and Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, USA)

  • Beaton Erynn E.

    (John Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA)

  • Manuella Pache de Athayde Maria

    (Public Policy and Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, USA)

  • Ojelabi Olanike

    (Public Policy and Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, USA)

Abstract

Representation is an important role of the nonprofit sector as these organizations can give voice to the priorities of their constituents. This is particularly important for disadvantaged communities that may lack access to traditional democratic processes. What advocacy tactics are most utilized by nonprofit organizations serving disadvantaged populations? Given variation in nonprofit advocacy tactics, which tactics are perceived as most effective? To answer these questions, we look to the framework of tactical repertoires from sociological studies of social movements. Analysis of a survey of New England nonprofits (N = 656, 55 % response rate) indicates that nonprofits serving disadvantaged populations use similar tactics to organizations advocating for other constituencies but employ them at higher rates. These tactics cluster into three tactical repertoires, each a different combination of advocacy tactics. Perceptions of advocacy effectiveness are associated with the size and nature of tactical repertoires, client participation in advocacy, government funding, and perceptions of the policy environment.

Suggested Citation

  • MacIndoe Heather & Beaton Erynn E. & Manuella Pache de Athayde Maria & Ojelabi Olanike, 2025. "Giving Voice: Examining the Tactical Repertoires of Nonprofit Advocacy for Disadvantaged Populations," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 29-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:29-53:n:1004
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2023-0054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2023-0054
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2023-0054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:29-53:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.