IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v13y2022i4p273-305n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Border Tax and Philanthropy: Avoiding the Icebergs in the Sea of Generosity

Author

Listed:
  • Breen Oonagh B.

    (Sutherland School of Law, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland)

  • Cordery Carolyn J.

    (School of Accounting and Commercial Law, Wellington School of Business and Government, Victoria University of Wellington, P O Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand)

Abstract

This study examines the structural and policy obstacles hampering free movement of philanthropic capital across the EU’s ‘sea of generosity’. While free movement of capital is a key element in the EU single market as enshrined in the Treaty of Maastricht, this principle previously focused on the for-profit sphere and efficient markets. In 2009, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) confirmed that the free movement principle also covered philanthropic capital, with Member States being prohibited from restricting philanthropic capital movements and payments across borders. This decision should facilitate cross-border fundraising, investment, and tax-effective giving by both corporates and individuals. Yet, significant regulatory drag hinders the use of fiscal incentives, and to date, proposals for EU-wide policy solutions (e.g. a common public benefit definition) have failed. Using the theoretical construct of regulatory space, we highlight the regulatory space characteristics impacting cross-border philanthropic capital movement. This multi-regulatory space analysis finds that contrasting actions by regulators, disparate national policies and the dominance of tax evasion concerns affect the free movement of philanthropic capital across the EU. We argue EU philanthropy could be expanded if there was greater clarity regarding administrative taxation procedures and support for foreign charities and donors seeking to navigate the straits of comparability.

Suggested Citation

  • Breen Oonagh B. & Cordery Carolyn J., 2022. "Cross-Border Tax and Philanthropy: Avoiding the Icebergs in the Sea of Generosity," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 273-305, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:13:y:2022:i:4:p:273-305:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2021-0031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2021-0031
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2021-0031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. Phillips Susan & Dalziel Katherine & Sjogren Keith, 2021. "Donor Advised Funds in Canada, Australia and the US: Differing Regulatory Regimes, Differing Streams of Policy Drift," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 409-441, October.
    2. Canning, Mary & O’Dwyer, Brendan, 2013. "The dynamics of a regulatory space realignment: Strategic responses in a local context," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 169-194.
    3. Young, Joni J., 1994. "Outlining regulatory space: Agenda issues and the FASB," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 83-109, January.
    4. Renate Buijze, 2017. "Tax Incentives Crossing Borders," Creative Economy, in: Sigrid Hemels & Kazuko Goto (ed.), Tax Incentives for the Creative Industries, chapter 0, pages 85-104, Springer.
    5. Duquette Nicolas, 2020. "A Two-Tiered Charitable Contribution Credit for All American Taxpayers," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Nicholls, Alex, 2010. "Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 394-415, May.
    7. Young, Joni J., 1995. "Getting the accounting "right": Accounting and the savings and loan crisis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 55-80, January.
    8. Tracy Artiach & Helen Irvine & Janet Mack & Christine Ryan, 2016. "The legitimising processes of a new regulator," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(5), pages 802-827, June.
    9. MacDonald, Laura D. & Richardson, Alan J., 2004. "Identity, appropriateness and the construction of regulatory space: the formation of the Public Accountant's Council of Ontario," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(5-6), pages 489-524.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ejiogu, Amanze & Ambituuni, Ambisisi & Ejiogu, Chibuzo, 2021. "Accounting for accounting’s role in the neoliberalization processes of social housing in England: A Bourdieusian perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Canning, Mary & O'Dwyer, Brendan, 2016. "Institutional work and regulatory change in the accounting profession," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-21.
    3. Canning, Mary & O’Dwyer, Brendan, 2013. "The dynamics of a regulatory space realignment: Strategic responses in a local context," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 169-194.
    4. Renata Stenka & Peter Taylor, 2010. "Setting UK standards on the concept of control: An analysis of lobbying behaviour," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 109-130.
    5. Suddaby, Roy & Saxton, Gregory D. & Gunz, Sally, 2015. "Twittering change: The institutional work of domain change in accounting expertise," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 52-68.
    6. Laura Girella, 2013. "Regulating through the "Logic of Appropriateness" and the "Rhetoric of the Expert": The Role of Consultants in the Case of Intangibles Reporting in Germany," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3-4), pages 75-109.
    7. Nicholls, Alex, 2010. "Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 394-415, May.
    8. Malsch, Bertrand & Gendron, Yves, 2011. "Reining in auditors: On the dynamics of power surrounding an “innovation” in the regulatory space," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 456-476.
    9. Baudot, Lisa & Cooper, David J., 2022. "Regulatory mandates and responses to uncomfortable knowledge: The case of country-by-country reporting in the extractive sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. repec:hal:journl:hal-04686904 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Napier, Christopher J., 2006. "Accounts of change: 30 years of historical accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 445-507.
    12. Elbannan, Mohamed & McKinley, William, 2006. "A theory of the corporate decision to resist FASB standards: An organization theory perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 601-622, October.
    13. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Arianna Manti & Daniel Iannaci, 2021. "Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    15. Sacchetti, Silvia & Tortia, Ermanno, 2012. "The internal and external governance of cooperatives: the effective membership and consistency of value," AICCON Working Papers 111-2012, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    16. Kohler, Hervé & Pochet, Christine & Le Manh, Anne, 2021. "Auditors as intermediaries in the endogenization of an accounting standard: The case of IFRS 15 within the telecom industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Muñoz, Pablo & Kibler, Ewald, 2016. "Institutional complexity and social entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1314-1318.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7515 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Young, Joni J. & Williams, Paul F., 2010. "Sorting and comparing: Standard-setting and “ethical” categories," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 509-521.
    20. Suddaby, Roy & Cooper, David J. & Greenwood, Royston, 2007. "Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 333-362.
    21. Klingler, Corinna & Shah, Sara M.B. & Barron, Anthony J.G. & Wright, John S.F., 2013. "Regulatory space and the contextual mediation of common functional pressures: Analyzing the factors that led to the German Efficiency Frontier approach," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 270-280.
    22. Garry Carnegie & Peter Wolnizer, 1999. "Unravelling the Rhetoric About the Financial Reporting of Public Collections as Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(17), pages 16-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:13:y:2022:i:4:p:273-305:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.