IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nglost/v4y2010i2p22n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Opinion Theory and the English School of International Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Rusciano Frank L.

    (Rider University)

Abstract

It is generally accepted that the English School of international relations theory, associated with the London School of Economics, approaches its subject from a different perspective than its American variants. This perception has endured into the post-Cold War era. Despite their countries' "special relationship," the American and English approaches are assumed to be separated by a common language, opposing assumptions, and divergent global interests.The following article challenges this perception by introducing global opinion theory, an American approach that shares more with its British counterpart than previous theories. A rhetorical research design, which focuses upon common usages in the quality press, will be used to test areas where the two approaches overlap and conflict in an attempt to reconcile and enrich both theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Rusciano Frank L., 2010. "Global Opinion Theory and the English School of International Relations," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:22:n:3
    DOI: 10.2202/1940-0004.1097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-0004.1097
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1940-0004.1097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:22:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.