IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nglost/v18y2024i3p301-324n1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Political Economy of Trade, Work, and Economy: De-globalization – or Re-globalization?

Author

Listed:
  • Smith David A.

    (8788 University of California Irvine , Irvine, 92697, USA)

  • Ciccantell Paul S.

    (4175 Western Michigan University , Kalamazoo, MI, USA)

Abstract

What forces will shape the global future? We begin with discussion of the central roles of globalization and the ecologically destructive Anthropocene and then move onto more current popular and political debates about questions of unchallengeable globalization versus de-globalization and re-globalization. We side with the former. The broad story is how historical global capitalism, with different leading core states or hegemons, inexorably pushed global society into an increasingly tight related connected world-economy, meshed together by commodity webs and supply chains that linked increasingly far-flung locations, geologies, landscapes, and ecosystems. The vision is one of a world-system, embedded to a large degree on market and nation-state capitalism and political power, conflict, and cooperation, that grows more and more tightly integrated, spatially widespread, and ecologically destructive as it expanded for six hundred years. We disagree with a fundamental “break” from the old political economy view. In fact, we are confident that today’s current Anthropocene global consciousness remains – with major concern with climate change and worldwide pandemics. There is little doubt that worldwide globalization is not only needed but essentially inescapable.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith David A. & Ciccantell Paul S., 2024. "The Political Economy of Trade, Work, and Economy: De-globalization – or Re-globalization?," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 18(3), pages 301-324.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:18:y:2024:i:3:p:301-324:n:1004
    DOI: 10.1515/ngs-2024-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2024-0011
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ngs-2024-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:18:y:2024:i:3:p:301-324:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.