IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nglost/v18y2024i1p1-17n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with Migration at an Institutional Level: The Collective Securitization Actions of the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Doğanyılmaz Duman Didem

    (Political Science and Public Administration, İzmir Democracy University, Karabaglar, İzmir 35140, Türkiye)

  • Duman Gökhan

    (Political Science and Public Administration, İzmir Democracy University, Karabaglar, İzmir 35140, Türkiye)

  • Oral Gül

    (Political Science and Public Administration, İzmir Democracy University, Karabaglar, İzmir 35140, Türkiye)

Abstract

Migration has been placed high on the agenda by the EU as being securitized related to policy changes as well as border security. Growing numbers of irregular migrants have paved the way for a systematic coordination and a consequent regional response in the region; therefore, dedicated security-based policies have been revised. This research analyzes the response that the EU put in action to the irregular migration due to the Arab Uprisings within the scope of collective securitization, and answers the question of why the EU has needed to respond to the demographic changes in the neighborhood as a supra-national securitizing actor. The empirical part of the research will be limited to the policy changes in the European Neighborhood Policy and the Schengen Agreement within the framework of institutional response between 2011 and 2015.

Suggested Citation

  • Doğanyılmaz Duman Didem & Duman Gökhan & Oral Gül, 2024. "Dealing with Migration at an Institutional Level: The Collective Securitization Actions of the European Union," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:1-17:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/ngs-2022-0032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2022-0032
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ngs-2022-0032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:1-17:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.