IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/mcmeap/v16y2010i1p69-93n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic study of efficient sampling methods to quantify uncertainty in crack propagation and the Burgers equation

Author

Listed:
  • Jimenez Edwin

    (Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4120, United States of America. E-mail: ejimenez@fsu.edu)

  • Lay Nathan

    (Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4120, United States of America. E-mail: nlay@fsu.edu)

  • Hussaini M. Yousuff

    (Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4120, United States of America. E-mail: myh@scs.fsu.edu)

Abstract

We present a systematic study of efficient sampling methods to quantify parametric uncertainty in stage II crack propagation and in a Burgers equation with random viscosity. The samplingmethods employed are Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods enhanced through variance reduction techniques including stratified sampling. We also present a recent variance reduction technique called sensitivity derivative enhanced sampling that utilizes sensitivity derivatives to make more efficient use of random samples. The crack propagation problem is a benchmark problem proposed by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE); this problem was selected because its large variance can hinder the already slow convergence of typical Monte Carlo methods and thus provides an ideal test for efficient sampling methods. We also examine a steady-state Burgers equation, a model equation of perennial interest for its connections with the equations of fluid mechanics, with uncertain viscosity.We demonstrate that sensitivity derivative enhanced sampling (SDES) can reduce the required number of samples by an order of magnitude to achieve the same accuracy as a traditionalMonte Carlo method. When SDES is coupled with other sampling techniques such as stratified sampling, the number of samples required can be reduced by as much as two orders of magnitude. In addition, we introduce an analogous approach that utilizes sensitivity derivatives which, under appropriate conditions, results in a more efficient quasi-Monte Carlo method.

Suggested Citation

  • Jimenez Edwin & Lay Nathan & Hussaini M. Yousuff, 2010. "A systematic study of efficient sampling methods to quantify uncertainty in crack propagation and the Burgers equation," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 69-93, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:16:y:2010:i:1:p:69-93:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/mcma.2010.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/mcma.2010.002
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/mcma.2010.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ngnepieba Pierre & Hussaini M. Y. & Debreu Laurent, 2006. "Optimal Control and Stochastic Parameter Estimation," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 12(5), pages 461-476, November.
    2. A. M. Croicu & M. Y. Hussaini, 2008. "Multiobjective Stochastic Control in Fluid Dynamics via Game Theory Approach: Application to the Periodic Burgers Equation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 501-514, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:16:y:2010:i:1:p:69-93:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.