IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/mcmeap/v11y2005i3p203-350n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quasi-Probability: Why quasi-Monte-Carlo methods are statistically valid and how their errors can be estimated statistically

Author

Listed:
  • Halton John H.

    (e-Mail: halton@cs.unc.edu, jhhxyz@earthlink.net.)

Abstract

The classical model of probability theory, due principally to Kolmogorov, defines probability as a totally-one measure on a sigma-algebra of subsets (events) of a given set (the sample space), and random variables as real-valued functions on the sample space, such that the inverse images of all Borel sets are events. From this model, all the results of probability theory are derived. However, the assertion that any given concrete situation is subject to probability theory is a scientific hypothesis verifiable only experimentally, by appropriate sampling, and never totally certain. Furthermore, classical probability theory allows for the possibility of "outliers"—sampled values which are misleading. In particular, Kolmogorov's Strong Law of Large Numbers asserts that, if, as is usually the case, a random variable has a finite expectation (its integral over the sample space), then the average value of N independently sampled values of this function converges to the expectation with probability 1, as N tends to infinity. This implies that there may be sample sequences (belonging to a set of probability 0) for which this convergence does not occur; these are the "outliers".It is proposed to derive a large and important part of the classical probabilistic results, on the simple basis that sample sets of p-dimensional points are so constructed that distributions of samples of size N converge to given limit distributions, as N tends to infinity. It can then be shown that, for any Riemann-integrable random variable (p-dimensional function) Ψ, the corresponding average value of a samples of size N of values of Ψ converges to the expectation (the Riemann integral) of Ψ, as N tends to infinity. This, and number of other useful results have already been proved, and further investigations are proceeding with much promise. By this device, the stochastic nature of some concrete situations is no longer, as heretofore, a likely scientific hypothesis, but rather a proven mathematical fact, and the problem of outliers is eliminated. This model may be referred to as "quasi-probability theory"; it is particularly appropriate for the large class of computations that are already referred to as "quasi-Monte-Carlo".

Suggested Citation

  • Halton John H., 2005. "Quasi-Probability: Why quasi-Monte-Carlo methods are statistically valid and how their errors can be estimated statistically," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 203-350, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:11:y:2005:i:3:p:203-350:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/1569396054495130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/1569396054495130
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/1569396054495130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Halton, John H. & Sarkar, Pradip K., 1998. "Increasing the efficiency of radiation shielding calculations by using antithetic variates," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 309-318.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:11:y:2005:i:3:p:203-350:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.