IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/lawdev/v12y2019i2p561-593n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mining Community Development in South Africa: A Critical Consideration of How the Law and Development Approach the Concept “Community”

Author

Listed:
  • Heyns Anri

    (DST/NRF SARChI Research Chair: Mineral Law in Africa, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa)

Abstract

The legislative system that provides for the socio-economic development of mining communities in South Africa has been under significant scrutiny in recent times. Various instances of conflict between mining communities and mining companies, of which the Marikana Massacre of 2012 is certainly the most noteworthy, show that mining communities expect mining companies to contribute more to the improvement of their living conditions. The relationship between mining communities and mining companies are exposed to the various socio-economic challenges that other sectors of the South African economy currently face. However, considering the legislative system in the mining industry specifically and in terms of a conceptual approach may show to the unique challenges the industry faces when it comes to mine community development. A conceptual approach requires asking whether the way in which the legislative system is framed and the rhetoric it promotes do not create expectations with mining communities that cannot be met by mining companies, because mining communities are not accurately depicted in the legislative system. The legislative system promotes “mine community development” by means of a complex interaction between various pieces of legislation and policy guidelines. At the centre of this interaction are the definitions of “community” and “mine community”. These definitions have been amended quite a few times since the enactment of the legislative system, attesting to the difficulty for the law to capture “community”. The latest iterations of the definitions are criticised for their ambiguity, causing uncertainty as to who should benefit from mine community development. This paper proposes that there is a conceptual problem when catering for communities, and not individuals, in a development paradigm, posing challenges for accurately defining “community”. It is not argued that community development should not be promoted, but a possible reason for why mine community development is not successful is proposed. The South African mining legislative system will be considered in parallel with relevant international legal instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Heyns Anri, 2019. "Mining Community Development in South Africa: A Critical Consideration of How the Law and Development Approach the Concept “Community”," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 561-593, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:561-593:n:11
    DOI: 10.1515/ldr-2019-0022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2019-0022
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ldr-2019-0022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rick Tilman, 2004. "Ferdinand Tonnies, Thorstein Veblen and Karl Marx: From community to society and back?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 579-606.
    2. Tony Binns & Etienne Nel, 2002. "Devolving Development: Integrated Development Planning and Developmental Local Government in Post-apartheid South Africa," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 921-932.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard L. Brinkman & June E. Brinkman, 2006. "Cultural Lag: In the Tradition of Veblenian Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 1009-1028, December.
    2. Etienne Nel, 2009. "Misplaced Expectations? The Experience of Applied Local Economic Development in Post-Apartheid South Africa," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 24(3), pages 224-237, May.
    3. Rick Tilman, 2005. "Thorstein Veblen’s Views on American “Exceptionalism”: An Interpretation," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 177-204, March.
    4. Edgar Pieterse, 2006. "Building with Ruins and Dreams: Some Thoughts on Realising Integrated Urban Development in South Africa through Crisis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(2), pages 285-304, February.
    5. David Bek & Tony Binns & Etienne Nel, 2004. "‘Catching the development train’: perspectives on ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ development in post-apartheid South Africa," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 4(1), pages 22-46, January.
    6. Ahmet Öncü, 2017. "On the Possibility of a “Soviet of Techniciansâ€," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 67-82, March.
    7. Waldo Krugell & W.a. Naudé & Stephanie Rossouw, 2000. "The Quality of Metropolitan City Life in South Africa," Regional and Urban Modeling 283600049, EcoMod.
    8. Kurt Sartorius & Benn Sartorius, 2016. "Service delivery inequality in South African municipal areas: A new way to account for inter-jurisdictional differences," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(15), pages 3336-3355, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:561-593:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.