Author
Listed:
- Chandrasekharan Reshma Chirayil
(KU Leuven, Department of Computer Science, CODeS & imec – Gebroeders De Smetstraat 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)
- Toffolo Túlio A.M.
(KU Leuven, Department of Computer Science, CODeS & imec – Gebroeders De Smetstraat 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)
- Wauters Tony
(KU Leuven, Department of Computer Science, CODeS & imec – Gebroeders De Smetstraat 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)
Abstract
The Traveling Umpire Problem (TUP) is a combinatorial optimization problem concerning the assignment of umpires to the games of a fixed double round-robin tournament. The TUP draws inspiration from the real world multi-objective Major League Baseball (MLB) umpire scheduling problem, but is, however, restricted to the single objective of minimizing total travel distance of the umpires. Several hard constraints are employed to enforce fairness when assigning umpires, making it a challenging optimization problem. The present work concerns a constructive matheuristic approach which focuses primarily on large benchmark instances. A decomposition-based approach is employed which sequentially solves Integer Programming (IP) formulations of the subproblems to arrive at a feasible solution for the entire problem. This constructive matheuristic efficiently generates feasible solutions and improves the best known solutions of large benchmark instances of 26, 28, 30 and 32 teams well within the benchmark time limit. In addition, the algorithm is capable of producing feasible solutions for various small and medium benchmark instances competitive with those produced by other heuristic algorithms. The paper also details experiments conducted to evaluate various algorithmic design parameters such as subproblem size, overlap and objective functions.
Suggested Citation
Chandrasekharan Reshma Chirayil & Toffolo Túlio A.M. & Wauters Tony, 2019.
"Analysis of a constructive matheuristic for the traveling umpire problem,"
Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 41-57, March.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:15:y:2019:i:1:p:41-57:n:1
DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2017-0118
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:15:y:2019:i:1:p:41-57:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.