IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jossai/v5y2017i4p289-301n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Earthquake Emergency Plan Based on SD Model

Author

Listed:
  • Chang Ran

    (School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China)

  • Zhao Qiuhong

    (School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China)

  • Mladenovic Nenad

    (Mathematical Institute, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia)

Abstract

Based on the system dynamics (SD) model, this paper puts forward a quantitative method to evaluate the earthquake emergency plan in China. Firstly, we analyze the disaster system structure and the content of plan. Using the analysis results, we establish a system dynamics (SD) model and then carry out its simulation. According to the simulation results, the rescue effect using the plan of 2012 is better than that of 2006. From the policy level, in order to reduce loss, government should maintain communication smoothly, improve the ability of self and mutual help, strengthen the management of public opinion, and pay more attention to secondary disasters.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang Ran & Zhao Qiuhong & Mladenovic Nenad, 2017. "Evaluation of Earthquake Emergency Plan Based on SD Model," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(4), pages 289-301, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jossai:v:5:y:2017:i:4:p:289-301:n:1
    DOI: 10.21078/JSSI-2017-289-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.21078/JSSI-2017-289-13
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21078/JSSI-2017-289-13?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jossai:v:5:y:2017:i:4:p:289-301:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.