IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jbwige/v60y2019i1p57-92n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Legal Differences Matter? A Comparison of German Patent Law Regimes before 1877

Author

Listed:
  • Donges Alexander

    (Universität Mannheim, Abteilung Volkswirtschaftslehre, L7, 3-5. D-68131 Mannheim, Germany)

  • Selgert Felix

    (Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Abt. Verfassungs-, Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, Konviktstraße 11, D-53113 Bonn, Germany)

Abstract

In this article, we give an overview of the differences in German patent legislations between 1815 and 1876. German patent laws differed in particular with regard to the application and approval system, the treatment of foreign applicants, and patent fees. Differences in the former two categories provide an explanation why the number of patents was considerably lower in Prussia than in other states. While the number of Prussian patents per capita almost stagnated between 1840 and 1872, it increased in Baden, Bavaria and Saxony. Formal differences in patent law do not fully explain this pattern, but Prussian patent policy does. The Prussian patent authority set high barriers to get a patent by applying a thorough technical examination and a strict definition of novelty. Furthermore, we show that states using a registration system granted a considerably higher number of patents than states with technical examinations.

Suggested Citation

  • Donges Alexander & Selgert Felix, 2019. "Do Legal Differences Matter? A Comparison of German Patent Law Regimes before 1877," Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook, De Gruyter, vol. 60(1), pages 57-92, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jbwige:v:60:y:2019:i:1:p:57-92:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/jbwg-2019-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbwg-2019-0004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbwg-2019-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lehmann-Hasemeyer, Sibylle H. & Streb, Jochen, 2018. "Discrimination against Foreigners. The Wuerttemberg Patent Law in Administrative Practice," Working Papers 7, German Research Foundation's Priority Programme 1859 "Experience and Expectation. Historical Foundations of Economic Behaviour", Humboldt University Berlin.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation; intellectual property; patents; patent law; technological change; Innovation; geistiges Eigentum; Patente; Patentrecht; Technologischer Wandel;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D - Microeconomics
    • K - Law and Economics
    • L - Industrial Organization
    • N - Economic History
    • O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jbwige:v:60:y:2019:i:1:p:57-92:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.