IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jbvela/v15y2020i1p20n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Financial Distress Value Relevant? – Implications for Multiple-Based Valuation

Author

Listed:
  • Goetz Sabrina

    (University of Hohenheim Department of Financial Management, Business Administration: Accounting and Finance, Schwerzstraße 42, 70599Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

In relative valuation peer groups of comparable companies are essential to derive the value of the firm. Valuing a target firm that is in financial distress by using a set of healthy peer group firms probably leads to an overvaluation. We examine whether the financial distress risk has an influence on a company’s value and quantify the discount through financial distress. We identify financial distress by Standard and Poor’s long-term issuer ratings and Altman’s z″-score. We then match the identified firms in financial distress with healthy counterparts that are comparable in value relevant characteristics, i. e. profitability, risk, and growth, to estimate the percentage difference in valuation multiples. Using rating information, in every year almost half of the companies are in financial distress whereas by Altman’s z″-score about 20% of the companies in the sample are in financial distress. We find that the discount caused by financial distress makes up about 4–7% of firm value. The discount increases for lower rating classes and lower z″-scores. Besides the degree of financial distress, market downturns as the financial crisis affect the distress discount.

Suggested Citation

  • Goetz Sabrina, 2020. "Is Financial Distress Value Relevant? – Implications for Multiple-Based Valuation," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:15:y:2020:i:1:p:20:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jbvela-2019-0015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2019-0015
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbvela-2019-0015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:15:y:2020:i:1:p:20:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.