IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v4y2008i1n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interaction Trees with Censored Survival Data

Author

Listed:
  • Su Xiaogang

    (University of Central Florida)

  • Zhou Tianni

    (University of Southern California)

  • Yan Xin

    (University of Missouri - Kansas City)

  • Fan Juanjuan

    (San Diego State University)

  • Yang Song

    (National Institutes of Health)

Abstract

We propose an interaction tree (IT) procedure to optimize the subgroup analysis in comparative studies that involve censored survival times. The proposed method recursively partitions the data into two subsets that show the greatest interaction with the treatment, which results in a number of objectively defined subgroups: in some of them the treatment effect is prominent while in others the treatment may have a negligible or even negative effect. The resultant tree structure can be used to explore the overall interaction between treatment and other covariates and help identify and describe possible target populations on which an experimental treatment demonstrates desired efficacy. We follow the standard CART (Breiman, et al., 1984) methodology to develop the interaction tree structure. Variable importance information is extracted via random forests of interaction trees. Both simulated experiments and an analysis of the primary billiary cirrhosis (PBC) data are provided for evaluation and illustration of the proposed procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Su Xiaogang & Zhou Tianni & Yan Xin & Fan Juanjuan & Yang Song, 2008. "Interaction Trees with Censored Survival Data," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:4:y:2008:i:1:n:2
    DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1071
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1557-4679.1071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. E. B. Laber & Y. Q. Zhao, 2015. "Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(3), pages 501-514.
    2. Shuai Chen & Lu Tian & Tianxi Cai & Menggang Yu, 2017. "A general statistical framework for subgroup identification and comparative treatment scoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1199-1209, December.
    3. L. Doove & E. Dusseldorp & K. Deun & I. Mechelen, 2014. "A comparison of five recursive partitioning methods to find person subgroups involved in meaningful treatment–subgroup interactions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(4), pages 403-425, December.
    4. Youngjoo Cho & Debashis Ghosh, 2021. "Quantile-Based Subgroup Identification for Randomized Clinical Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 13(1), pages 90-128, April.
    5. Cho, Youngjoo & Zhan, Xiang & Ghosh, Debashis, 2022. "Nonlinear predictive directions in clinical trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Ruoqing Zhu & Ying-Qi Zhao & Guanhua Chen & Shuangge Ma & Hongyu Zhao, 2017. "Greedy outcome weighted tree learning of optimal personalized treatment rules," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 391-400, June.
    7. Yaoyao Xu & Menggang Yu & Ying‐Qi Zhao & Quefeng Li & Sijian Wang & Jun Shao, 2015. "Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 645-653, September.
    8. Piyali Basak & Antonio Linero & Debajyoti Sinha & Stuart Lipsitz, 2022. "Semiparametric analysis of clustered interval‐censored survival data using soft Bayesian additive regression trees (SBART)," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 880-893, September.
    9. Rui Zhang & Guoyou Qin & Dongsheng Tu, 2023. "A robust threshold t linear mixed model for subgroup identification using multivariate T distributions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 299-326, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:4:y:2008:i:1:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.