IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v20y2024i2p553-570n1009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid classical-Bayesian approach to sample size determination for two-arm superiority clinical trials

Author

Listed:
  • Sambucini Valeria

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro n. 5, 00185 Roma, Italy)

Abstract

Traditional methods for Sample Size Determination (SSD) based on power analysis exploit relevant fixed values or preliminary estimates for the unknown parameters. A hybrid classical-Bayesian approach can be used to formally incorporate information or model uncertainty on unknown quantities by using prior distributions according to the Bayesian approach, while still analysing the data in a frequentist framework. In this paper, we propose a hybrid procedure for SSD in two-arm superiority trials, that takes into account the different role played by the unknown parameters involved in the statistical power. Thus, different prior distributions are used to formalize design expectations and to model information or uncertainty on preliminary estimates involved at the analysis stage. To illustrate the method, we consider binary data and derive the proposed hybrid criteria using three possible parameters of interest, i.e. the difference between proportions of successes, the logarithm of the relative risk and the logarithm of the odds ratio. Numerical examples taken from the literature are presented to show how to implement the proposed procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Sambucini Valeria, 2024. "Hybrid classical-Bayesian approach to sample size determination for two-arm superiority clinical trials," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 553-570.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:20:y:2024:i:2:p:553-570:n:1009
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2023-0050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2023-0050
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2023-0050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:20:y:2024:i:2:p:553-570:n:1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.