IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v20y2024i2p419-431n1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hypothesis testing for detecting outlier evaluators

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Li

    (Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Zucker David M.

    (Department of Statistics and Data Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel)

  • Wang Molin

    (Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA)

Abstract

In epidemiological studies, the measurements of disease outcomes are carried out by different evaluators. In this paper, we propose a two-stage procedure for detecting outlier evaluators. In the first stage, a regression model is fitted to obtain the evaluators’ effects. Outlier evaluators have different effects than normal evaluators. In the second stage, stepwise hypothesis tests are performed to detect outlier evaluators. The true positive rate and true negative rate of the proposed procedure are assessed in a simulation study. We apply the proposed method to detect potential outlier audiologists among the audiologists who measured hearing threshold levels of the participants in the Audiology Assessment Arm of the Conservation of Hearing Study, which is an epidemiological study for examining risk factors of hearing loss.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Li & Zucker David M. & Wang Molin, 2024. "Hypothesis testing for detecting outlier evaluators," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 419-431.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:20:y:2024:i:2:p:419-431:n:1006
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2023-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2023-0004
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2023-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:20:y:2024:i:2:p:419-431:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.