IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v20y2024i1p93-106n1008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical Bayesian bootstrap for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Oganisian Arman

    (Department of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA)

  • Mitra Nandita

    (Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA)

  • Roy Jason A.

    (Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA)

Abstract

A major focus of causal inference is the estimation of heterogeneous average treatment effects (HTE) – average treatment effects within strata of another variable of interest such as levels of a biomarker, education, or age strata. Inference involves estimating a stratum-specific regression and integrating it over the distribution of confounders in that stratum – which itself must be estimated. Standard practice involves estimating these stratum-specific confounder distributions independently (e.g. via the empirical distribution or Rubin’s Bayesian bootstrap), which becomes problematic for sparsely populated strata with few observed confounder vectors. In this paper, we develop a nonparametric hierarchical Bayesian bootstrap (HBB) prior over the stratum-specific confounder distributions for HTE estimation. The HBB partially pools the stratum-specific distributions, thereby allowing principled borrowing of confounder information across strata when sparsity is a concern. We show that posterior inference under the HBB can yield efficiency gains over standard marginalization approaches while avoiding strong parametric assumptions about the confounder distribution. We use our approach to estimate the adverse event risk of proton versus photon chemoradiotherapy across various cancer types.

Suggested Citation

  • Oganisian Arman & Mitra Nandita & Roy Jason A., 2024. "Hierarchical Bayesian bootstrap for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 93-106.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:93-106:n:1008
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2022-0051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2022-0051
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2022-0051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:93-106:n:1008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.